own will. " Therefore, since her faith was well founded, it must necessarily turn out as she believed. And, if it perplexes you to have me say that it is necessary, remember that the reality of the virgin's faith was not the cause of his dying by his own free will; but, because this was destined to take place, therefore her faith was real. If, then, it be said that it was necessary for him to die of his single choice, because the antecedent faith and prophecy were true, this is no more than saying that it must be because it was to be. But such a necessity as this does not compel a thing to be, but only implies a necessity of its existence. There is an antecedent necessity which is the cause of a thing, and there is also a subsequent necessity arising from the thing itself. Thus, when the heavens are said to revolve, it is an antecedent and efficient necessity, for they must revolve. But when I say that you speak of necessity, because you are speaking, this is nothing but a subsequent and inoperative necessity. For I only mean that it is impossible for you to speak and not to speak at the same time, and not that some one compels you to speak.
For the force of its own nature makes the heaven revolve; but no necessity obliges you to speak. But wherever there is an antecedent necessity, there is also a subsequent one; but not vice versa. For we can say that the heaven revolves of necessity, because it revolves; but it is not likewise true that, because you speak, you do it of necessity. This subsequent necessity pertains to everything, so that we say: Whatever has been, necessarily has been. Whatever is, must be. Whatever is to be, of necessity will be. This is that necessity which Aristotle treats of ("</<? propositionibus singularibus et futuris"), and which seems to destroy any alternative and to ascribe a necessity to all things. By this subsequent and imperative necessity, was it necessary (since the belief and prophecy concerning Christ were true, that he would die of his own free will), that it should be so. For this he became man; for this he did and suffered all things undertaken by him; for this he chose as he did. For therefore were they necessary, because they were to be, and they were to be because they were, and they were because they were; and, if you wish to know the real necessity of all things which he did and suffered, know that they were of necessity, because he wished them to be. But no necessity preceded his will. Wherefore if they were not save by his will, then, had he not willed they would not have existed. So then, no one took his life from him, but he laid it down of himself and took it again; for he had power to lay it down and to take it again, as he himself said. Boso. You have satisfied me that it cannot be proved that he was subjected to death by any necessity; and I cannot regret my importunity in urging you to make this explanation.
eAnscltn. I think we have shown with sufficient learness how it was that God took a man without sin om a sinful substance; but I would on no account deny that there is no other explanation than this which we have given, for God can certainly do what human reason cannot grasp. But since this appears adequate, and since in search of other arguments we should involve ourselves in such questions as that of original sin, and how it was transmitted by our first parents to all mankind, except this man of whom we are speaking; and since, also, we should be drawn into various other questions, each demanding its own separate consideration; let us be satisfied with this account of the matter, and go on to complete our intended work.
Boso. As you choose; but with this condition that, by the help of God, you will sometime give this other explanation, which you owe me, as it were, but which now you avoid discussing.
Anseltn. Inasmuch as I entertain this desire myself, I will not refuse you; but because of the uncertainty of future events, I dare not promise you, but commend it to the will of God. But say now, what remains to be unravelled with regard to the question which you proposed in the first place, and which involves many others with it?
Boso. The substance of the inquiry was this, why God became man, for the purpose of saving men by his death, when he could have done it in some other -^ - — way,-} And you, by numerous and positive reasons, / ' 1 have shown that the restoring of mankind ought not / J to take place, and could not, without man paid the debt which he owed God for his sin. And this debt was so great that, while none but man must solve the debt, none but God was able to do it; so that he who does it must be both God and man. And hence arises a necessity that God should take man into unity with his own person; so that he who in his own nature was bound to pay the debt, but could not, might be able to do it in the person of God. In fine, you have shown that that man, who was also God, must be formed from the virgin, and from the person of the Son of God, and that he could be taken without sin, though from a sinful substance. Moreover, you have clearly shown the life of this man to have been so excellent and so glorious as to make ample satisfaction for the sins of the whole world, and even infinitely more. It now, therefore, remains to be shown how that payment is made to God for the sins of men.
CHAPTER XVIII (b.)
How Christ's life is paid to God for the sins of men, and in what sense Christ ought, and in what sense he ought not, or was not bound, to suffer.
Anselm. If he allowed himself to be slain for the sake of justice, he did not give his life for the honor of God?
Boso. It should seem so, but I cannot understand, although I do not doubt it, how he could do this reasonably. If I saw how he could be perfectly holy, and yet forever preserve his life, I would acknowledge that he freely gave, for the honor of God, such a gift as surpasses all things else but God himself, and is able to atone for all the sins of men.
Anselm. Do you not perceive that when he bore D£C 7 with gentle patience the insults put upon him, violence and even crucifixion among thieves that he might maintain strict holiness; by this he set men an example that they should never turn aside from the holiness due to God on account of personal sacrifice? But how could he have done this, had he, as he might have done, avoided the death brought upon him for such a reason?
Boso. But surely there was no need of this, for many persons before his coming, and John the Baptist after his coming but before his death, had sufficiently enforced this example by nobly dying for the sake of the truth.
Anselm. No man except this one ever gave to God what he was not obliged to lose, or paid a debt he did not owe. But he freely offered to the Father what there was no need of his ever losing, and paid for sinners what he owed not for himself. Therefore he set a much nobler example, that each one should not hesitate to give to God, for himself, what he must at any rate lose before long, since it was the voice of reason; for he, when not in want of anything for himself and not compelled by others, who deserved nothing of him but punishment, gave so precious a life, even the life of so illustrious a personage, with such willingness.
Boso. You very nearly meet my wishes; but suffer me to make one inquiry, which you may think foolish, but which, nevertheless, I find no easy thing to answer. You say that when he died he gave what he did not owe. But no one will deny that it was better for him, or that so doing he pleased God more than if he had not done it. Nor will any one say that he was not bound to do what was best to be done, and what CUR DEUS HOMO. 28l CUR DEUS HOMO. 28l he knew would be more pleasing to God. How then can we affirm that he did not owe God the thing which he did, that is, the thing which he knew to be best and most pleasing to God, and especially since every creature owes God all that he is and all that he knows and all that he is capable of?
Anselm. Though the creature has nothing of himself, yet when God grants him the liberty of doing or not doing a thing, he leaves the alternative with him, so that, though one is better than the other, yet neither is positively demanded. And, whichever he does, it may be said that he ought to do it; and if he takes the better choice, he deserves a reward; because he. renders freely what is his own. For, though celibacy be better than marriage, yet neither is absolutely enjoined upon man; so that both he who chooses marriage and he who prefers celibacy, may be said to do as they ought. For no one says that either celibacy or marriage ought not to be chosen; but we say that what a man esteems best before taking action upon any of these things, this he ought to do. And if a man preserves his celibacy as a free gift offered to God, he looks for a reward. When you say that the creature owes God what he knows to be the better choice, and what he is able to do, if you mean that he owes it as a debt, without implying any command on the part of God, it is not always true. Thus, as I have already said, a man is not bound to celibacy as a debt, but ought to marry if he prefers it. And if / you are unable to understand the use of this word "debere," when no debt is implied, let me inform you that we use the word "debere" precisely as we sometimes do the words "posse" and "non posse" and also "necessitas" when the ability, etc., is not in the things 1 themselves, but in something else. When, for instance, we say that the poor ought to receive alms from the rich, we mean that the rich ought to bestow alms upon the poor. For this is a debt not owed by the poor but by the rich.v^Ve also say that God ought to be exalted over all, ncT because there is any obligation resting upon him, but because all things ought Vto be subject to him. And he wishes that all creatures should be what they ought; for what God wishes to be ought to be. And, in like manner, when any creature wishes to do a thing that is left entirely at his own disposal, we say that he ought to do it, for what he wishes to be ought to be. So our Lord Jesus, when he wished, as we have said, to suffer death, ought to have done precisely what he did; because he ought to be what he wished, and was not bound to do anything as a debt. As he is both God and man, in connection with his human nature, which made him a man, he must also have received from the Divine nature that control over himself which freed him from all obligation, except to do as he chose. In like manner, as one person of the Trinity, he must have had whatever he possessed of his own right, so as to be complete in himself, and could not have been under obligations to another, nor have need of giving anything Jn order to be repaid himself. .^"' Boso. Now I see clearly that he did not give him- * ': self up to die for the honor of God, as a debt; for this \ my own reason proves, and yet he ought to have done \ what he did.
Anseltn. That honor certainly belongs to the whole Trinity; and, since he is very God, the Son of God, he offered himself for his own honor, as well as for that of the Father and the Holy Spirit; that is, he CUK DEUS HOMO. 283 gave his humanity to his divinity, which is one person of the Triune God. But, though we express our idea more definitely by clinging to the precise troth, yet we may say, according to our custom, that the Son freely gave himself to the Father. For thus we plainly affirm that in speaking of one person we understand the whole Deity, to whom as man he offered himself. And, by the names of Father and Son, a wondrous depth of devotion is excited in the hearts of the hearers, when it is said that the Son supplicates the Father on our behalf.
Boso. This I readily acknowledge.
How human salvation follows upon his death.
Anselm. Let us now observe, if we can, h aw t he salvation of men rests on this.
Boso. This is the very wish of my heart. For, although I think I understand you, yet I wish to get from you the close chain of argument.
Anselm. There is no need of explaining how precious was the gift which the Son freely gave.
Boso. That is clear enough already.
Anselm. But you surely will not think that he deserves no reward, who freely gave to great a gift to God.
Boso. I see that it i* nwoftwry for the Father to reward the Son; el*a h«i la gither unjuat in not wish- \ ingtodoit, or weak in »ot luring wlrio to do it; but,' neither of these thiug« mmi \m attributed to God.
Anselm. H«* who tawtfrri* auotlier fiither gives him something which \m Ant* unt Imv*, or clue remits some rightful claim m^um U\m> tint anterior to the V great offering of the Son, all things belonging to the Father were his, nor did he ever owe anything which could be forgiven him. How then can a reward be bestowed on one who needs nothing, and to whom no gift or release can be made?
Boso. I see on the one hand a necessity for a reward, and on the other it appears impossible £ tor God must necessarily render payment for what he owes, and yet there is no one to receive it.
Anselm. But if a reward so large and so deserved is not given to him or any one else, then it will almost appear as if the Son had done this great wor k in vain.
Boso. Such a supposition is impious.
Anselm, The reward then must be bestowed upon some one else, for it cannot be upon him.
Boso. This is necessarily so.
Anselm. Had the Son wished to give some one else what was due to him, could the Father rightfully prevent it, or refuse to give it to the other person?
Boso. No! but I think it would be both just and necessary that the gift should be given by the Father to whomsoever the Son wished; because the Son should be allowed to give away what is his own, and the Father cannot bestow it at all except upon some other person.
Anselm A Upon whom would he more properly bestow the reward accruing from his death, than upon those for whose salvation, as right reason teaches, he became man; and for whose sake, as we have already said, he left an example of suffering death to preserve holiness? CFor surely in vain will men imitate him, if they be not also partakers of his reward. J Or whom could he more justly make heirs of the inheritance, which he does not need, and of the superfluity of his possessions, than his parents and brethren? (What more proper than that, when he beholds so many of them weighed down by so heavy a debt, and wasting through poverty, in the depth of their miseries, he should remit the debt incurred by their sins, and give them what their transgressions had forfeited? ' Boso. The universe can hear of nothing more reasonable, more sweet, more desirable. And I receive such confidence from this that I cannot describe the joy with which my heart exults. For it seems to me that God can reject none who come to him in his name.
Anseltn. Certainly not, if he come aright. And the Scriptures, which rest on solid truth as on a firm foundation, and which, by the help of God, we have somewhat examined, — the Scriptures, I say, show us how to approach in order to share such favor, and how we ought to live under it.
Boso, And whatever is built on this foundation is founded on an immovable rock.
Anseltn. I think I have nearly enough answered your inquiry, though I might do it still more fully, and there are doubtless many reasons which are beyond me and which mortal ken does not reach. It is also plain that God had no need of doing the thing spoken of, but eternal truth demanded it. For though God is said to have done what that man did, on account of the personal union made; yet God was in no need of descending from heaven to conquer the devil, nor of contending against him in holiness to free mankind. But God demanded that man should conquer the devil, so that he who had offended by sin should atone by holiness. As God owed nothing to the devil but punishment, so man must only make amends by v conquering the devil as man had already been conquered by him. But whatever was demanded of man, he owed to God and not to the devil.
How great and bow just is God's compassion.
Now we have found the compassion of God which appeared lost to you when we were considering God's holiness and man's sin; we have found it, I say, so great and so consistent with his holiness, as to be incomparably above anything that can be conceived. For what compassion can excel these words of the Father, addressed to the sinner doomed to eternal torments and having noway of escape: "Take my only begotten Son and make him an offering for yourself;" or these words of the Son: "Take me, and ransom your souls. " For these are the voices they utter, when inviting and leading us to faith in the Gospel. Or can anything be more just than for him to remit all debt since he has earned a reward greater than all debt, if given with the love which he deserves.
How it is impossible for the devil to be reconciled.
If you carefully consider the scheme of human salvation, you will perceive the reconciliation of the devil, of which you made inquiry, to be impossible. For, as man could not be reconciled but by the death of the God-man, by whose holiness the loss occasioned by man's sin should be made up; so fallen angels cannot be saved but by the death of a God-angel who by his holiness may repair the evil occasioned by the sins of his companions. And as man must not be restored by a man of a different race, though of the same nature, so no angel ought to be saved by any other angel, though all were of the same nature, for they are not like men, all of the same race. For all angels were not sprung from one, as all men were. And there is another objection to their restoration, viz, that, as they fell with none to plot their fall, so they must rise with none to aid them; but this is impossible. But otherwise they cannot be restored to their original dignity. For, had they not sinned, they would have been confirmed in virtue without any foreign aid, simply by the power given to them from the first. And, therefore, if any one thinks that the redemption of our Lord ought to be extended even to the fallen angels, he is convinced by reason, for by reason he has been deceived. And I do not say this as if to deny that the virtue of his death far exceeds all the sins of men and angels, but because infallible reason rejects the reconciliation of the fallen angels.
How the truth of the Old and New Testament is shown in the things which have been said.
Boso. All things which you have said seem to me reasonable and incontrovertible. And by the solution of the single question proposed do I see the truth of all that is contained in the Old and New Testament. For, in proving that God became man by necessity, leaving out what was taken from the Bible, viz., the remarks on the persons of the Trinity, and on Adam, you convince both Jews and Pagans by the mere force of reason. And the God-man himself originates the New Testament and approves the Old. And, as we must acknowledge him to be true, so no one can dissent from anything contained in these books.
Anselm. If we have said anything that needs correction, I am willing to make the correction if it be a reasonable one. But, if the conclusions which we have arrived at by reason seem confirmed by the testimony of the truth, then ought we to attribute it, not to ourselves, but to God, who is blessed forever. — Amen.
Catalogue of Publications Open Court Publishing Company Chicago, Motion Building, 324 Dearborn St.
London, Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co., Ltd.
SUNDARA ROW, T.
GEOMETRIC EXERCISES IN PAPER-FOLDING.
With Half-Tones from Photographs of Exercises. Pages, x -f 148 Cloth, f 1.00 net (4s. 6d. net).
COPE, E. D.
THE PRIMARY FACTORS OF ORGANIC EVOLUTION. 121 cuts. Pp. xvi, 547. Cloth, $2.00. net (xos.).
MULLER, F. MAX.
THREE INTRODUCTORY LECTURES ON THE SCIENCE OF THOUGHT. xa8 pages. Cloth, 75c (3s. 6d ).
THREE LECTURES ON THE SCIENCE OF LANGUAGE. 1X2 pages. 2nd Edition. Cloth, 75c (3s. 6d.).
ROMANES, GEORGE JOHN.
DARWIN AND AFTER DARWIN.
Three Vols., $4.00. Singly, as follows: 1. The Darwinian Theory. 46 pages. 125 illustrations. Cloth, $2.00 2. Post-Darwinian Questions. Heredity and Utility. Pp. 338. $ 1.50 3. Post-Darwinian Questions. Isolation and Physiological Selection AN EXAMINATION OF WEISMANNISM. 230 pages. Cloth, $1.00 net.
THOUGHTS ON RELIGION.
Third Edition, Pages, 184. Cloth, gilt top, fx.25 net.
A CANDID EXAMINATION OF THEISM. Pages, xi., 197. Cloth, $2.00.
SHUTE, D. KERFOOT.
FIRST BOOK IN ORGANIC EVOLUTION.
9 colored plates, 39 cats. Pp. xvi+ 285. Price, f&oo net (7s. 6d. net).
CUMONT, FRANZ.
THE MYSTERIES OF MITHRA.
HILBERT, DAVID, THE FOUNDATIONS OF GEOMETRY.
With many new additions still unpublished in German. Translated by E. J. Townsend. Pp. 140. Price, f x.oo net (4s. 6d. net).
LAGRANGE, JOSEPH LOUIS.
LECTURES ON ELEMENTARY MATHEMATICS.
With portrait of the author. Pp. 172. Price, f x 00 net (4s. 6d. net).
CARUS. PAUL.
THB HISTORY OF THE DEVIL, AND THE IDEA OF EVIL. 311 Maturations. Paxes, 300. Price, 16 00 (30s.)* THB CROWN OF THORNS.
A Story of the Time of Christ. Illustrated. Pages, 73. Cloth, 73c net (3s. 6d. net).
EROS AND PSYCHE.
Illustrations by Paul Thnmann. Pp. 125. CI., $1.30 net (6s. net).
WHENCE AND WHITHER?
196 pages. Cloth, 73c net (3s. 6d. net).
THE ETHICAL PROBLEM.
Second edition, revised and enlarged. 351 pages. Cloth, fz.as (6s. 6d.).
FUNDAMENTAL PROBLEMS.
Third edition. 372 pp. CI., $1.30 (7s. 6d.).
HOMILIES OF SCIENCE.
THE IDEA OF GOD Fourth edition. 32 pages. Paper 15c (9d.).
THB SOUL OF MAN.
2nd ed. 182 cuts. 482 pages. Cloth, $1.50 net (6s. net).
THE CHIEFS DAUGHTER.
Illustrated. Pp. 34. Cloth, f 1.00 net (4s. 6d. net).
THE RELIGION OF SCIENCE.
Second, extra edition. Pp. 103. Cloth, 30c net (28. 6d.).
PRIMER OF PHILOSOPHY 240 pages. Third Edition. Cloth, f z.oo (5s.).
THE GOSPEL OF BUDDHA. According to Old Records.
BUDDHISM AND ITS CHRISTIAN CRITICS. Pages, 3zx. Cloth, fz 25 (6s. 6d.).
KARMA. A Story of Early Buddhism.
Illustrated by Japanese artists. Crepe paper, 75c (3s. 6d.).
NIRVANA: A Story of Buddhist Psychology. American edition. 60c net (38. net).
LAO-TZE'S TAO TEH KING.
GOETHE AND SCHILLER'S XENIONS.
DAS EVANGELIUM BUDDHAS.
GODWARD.
SACRED TUNES FOR THE CONSECRATION OF LIFE.
OUR NEED OF PHILOSOPHY. Pages, 14. Paper, 5c (3d.).
SCIENCE A RELIGIOUS REVELATION. Pages, 2i. Paper, 5c (3d.).
TRUTH IN FICTION.
THE AGE OF CHRIST.
Pages, 34. Paper, 15c (gs.).
THE SURD OF METAPHYSICS.
Pages, vii., 233. Cloth, fi.25 net (6s. 6d. net).
EDMUNDS, ALBERT J.
HYMNS OF THE FAITH (DHAMMAPADA).
Being an Ancient Anthology Preserved in the Short Collection of the Sacred Scriptures of the Buddhists. Pp. xiv+ixo. Cloth, f i net.
DELITZSCH, F.
BABEL AND BIBLE.
Two Lectures. With Criticisms and the Author's Replies. 75c net.
HAUPT, PAUL.
BIBLICAL LOVE DITTIES.
HOLYOAKE, G. J.
ENGLISH SECULARISM, A CONFESSION OF BELIEF. Pages, xiii., 146. 50c net.
INGRAHAM, ANDREW.
SWAIN SCHOOL LECTURES.
INOUYE, J.
SKETCHES OF TOKYO LIFE.
LEIBNITZ.
LEIBNITZ'S METAPHYSICS, ETC.
Transl. by Dr. George R. Montgomery. 75c (3s. 6d.).
MACH ERNST.
THE SCIENCE OF MECHANICS.
Transl. by T. J. McCormack. Pages, zz., 605. $2 00 net (7s. 6d. net) THE ANALYSIS OF THE SENSATIONS. Pages, xi., 208. f 1.25 net (4s. 6d, net).
POPULAR SCIENTIFIC LECTURES.
Transl. by T. J. McCormack. Pages, 415. fi.50 net (6s. net).
PORTRAITS.
PHILOSOPHICAL PORTRAITS. 25c each. Set, $6.25.
PSYCHOLOGICAL PORTRAITS. 25c each. Set, $3.75. Both sets on one order, $7.50.
RADAU, DR. HUGO.
THE CREATION-STORY OF GENESIS I. Pages, 70, vi. Boards, 75c net (3s. 6d. net).
STANLEY, H.
PSYCHOLOGY FOR BEGINNERS. Pages, 44. 40c net.
WAGNER, RICHARD.
A PILGRIMAGE TO BEETHOVEN. Pages, vii.. 40. 50c net (2s. 6d. net).
YAMADA, K.
SCENES FROM THE LIFE OF BUDDHA.
From the paintings of Keichyu Yamada. $2.50 net.
MILLS, LAWRENCE H.
THE GATHAS OF ZARATHUSHTRA (ZOROASTER) IN METRE AND RHYTHM.
FINK, KARL.
A BRIEF HISTORY OF MATHEMATICS.
From the German. Pp, 333. Cloth, $1.50 net (5s. 6d. net).
SCHUBERT, HERMANN.
MATHEMATICAL ESSAYS AND RECREATIONS. Pp. 149. Cuts, 37. Cloth, 75c net (3s. net).
HUC AND GABET, MM.
TRAVELS IN TARTARY, THIBET AND CHINA!
zoo cuts. Pp. 688. a vols. $2.00 (xos.). One vol., f 1.25 net (5s. net).
CORNILL, CARL HEINRICH.
THE PROPHETS OF ISRAEL.
HISTORY OF THE PEOPLE OF ISRAEL.
GESCHICHTE DES VOLKES ISRAEL.
THE RISE OF THE PEOPLE OF ISRAEL.
POWELL, J. W.
TRUTH AND ERROR; or, the Science of Intellection.
BUDGE, E. A. W.
BOOK OF THE DEAD.
420 vignettes. 3 vols. Cloth, $3.75 net.
A HISTORY OF EGYPT. 8 volumes, f 10.00.
HUTCHINSON, WOODS.
THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO DARWIN.
AQVAGHOSHA.
DISCOURSE ON THE AWAKENING OF FAITH in the MahSySna. From the Chinese. Pp., 176. CI., $ 1.25 net (5s. net).
HUEPPE, FERDINAND.
THE PRINCIPLES OF BACTERIOLOGY.
RIBOT, TH.
THE PSYCHOLOGY OF ATTENTION.
THE DISEASES OF PERSONALITY.
THE DISEASES OF THE WILL.
Cloth, 75 cents each (3s. 6d.). Full set, cloth, Si. 75 fas.)- EVOLUTION OF GENERAL IDEAS.
DE MORGAN, AUGUSTUS.
ON THE STUDY AND DIFFICULTIES OF MATHEMATICS. Pp. viii+288. Cloth, f 1.25 net (4s. 6d. net).
ELEMENTARY ILLUSTRATIONS OF THE DIFFERENTIAL AND INTEGRAL CALCULUS. New reprint edition. Price, $1.00 net (4s. 6d. net).
FREYTAG, GUSTAV.
THE LOST MANUSCRIPT. A Novel.
2 vols. 953 pages. Extra cloth, $4.00 (sis). One vol., cl., $1.00 (5s.).
MARTIN LUTHER.
Illustrated. Pp.130. Cloth, $1.00 net (5s.).
TRUMBULL, M. M.
THE FREE TRADE STRUGGLE IN ENGLAND. Second Edition. 296 pages. Cloth, 75c (3s. 6d.).
WHEELBARROW: Articles and Discussions on thk Labor Question With portrait of the author. 303 pages. Cloth, $1.00 (5s.).
GUNKEL, H.
THE LEGENDS OF GENESIS.
From the German. Pp. 164. Cloth, fi.oo net (4s. 6d. net).
OLDENBERG, H.
ANCIENT INDIA: ITS LANGUAGE AND RELIGIONS. Pp. no. Cloth, 50c net (2s. 6d.).
CONWAY, MONCURE D.
SOLOMON, AND SOLOMONIC LITERATURE.
DEDEKIND, R.
ESSAYS ON THE THEORY OF NUMBER.
Trans, by W. W. Beman. Pp. 115. Cl., 75 cents net (3s. net).
GARBE, RICHARD.
THE REDEMPTION OF THE BRAHMAN. A Tale or Hindu Life. Laid paper. Gilt top. 96 pages. Price, 75c (3s. 6d.).
THE PHILOSOPHY OF ANCIENT INDIA. Pp. 89. Cloth, 50c net (as. 6d.).
LfeVY-BRUHL, L.
HISTORY OF MODERN PHILOSOPHY IN FRANCE. 23 Portraits. Pp. 500. Cloth, $3-00 net (12s. net).
TOPINARD, PAUL. SCIENCE AND FAITH.
BINET, ALFRED.
THE PSYCHOLOGY OF REASONING.
THE PSYCHIC LIFE OF MICRO-ORGANISMS.
N. B. Send for our large Illustrated Catalogue, containing full details of our publications and of our two magazines, The Open Court and The Monist.
The Religion of Science Library.
Bi-monthly reprints of standard works, philosophical classics, etc. Yearly, $1.50. Separate copies according to prices quoted.
No. 1. The Religion of Science. By Paul Casus. 35c (is. 6d).
a. Three Introductory Lecture* on the Science of Thought. By F. Max MOlleb. 35c (xs. 6d.).
3. Three Lecture* on the Science of Language. F. Max MDllbr 35c (is. 6d.).
4. The Diseases of Per tonality. By Th. Ribot. 25c (is. 6d.).
5. The Psychology 0/ Attention. By Th. Ribot. 25c (is. 6d.).
7. The Nature of the State. By Paul Carus. 15c (9d.).
8. On Double Consciousness. By Alfred Bimkt. 15c (gd.).
9. Fundamental Problem*. By Paul Carus. 50c (as. 6d.).
10. The Diseases of the Will. By Th. Ribot. 25c (xs. 6d.i 11. The Origin of Language. By Ludwio Noirb. 15c (9a.).
ia. The Free Trade Struggle in England. M. M. Trumbull. 25c (is. 6d.} 13. Wheelbarrow on the LJabor Question. By M. M. Trumbull. 35c (2s.)
14. The Gospel of Buddha. By Paul Carus. 35c (2s.). — The Prtmer of Philosophy. By Paul Carus. 25c (is. 6d.).
On Memory, and The Specific Energies of the Nervous System. By Prof Ewald Hiring. 15c (9d.).
17. The Redemption of the Brahm 18. An Examination of Weitmannitm. By G. J. Romanes. 35c (as.).
The Redemption of the Brahman. A Novel. R. Garbs. 25c (xs. 6d.).
19. On Germinal Selection. By August Wbismann. 25c (is. 6d.).
20. Lover* Three Thousand Years Ago. By T. A. Goodwin. (Out of print.) 2X. Popular Scientific Lectures. By Ernst Mach. 50c (as. 6a.).
22. Ancient India: Us Language and Religions. By H. Oldenbbrg. 25c 23. The Prophets of Israel. By Prof. C H. Cornill. 23c (1. 6d.).
24. Homilies of Science. By Paul Carus. 33c (as.).
26. The Philosophy of Ancient Indta. By Prof. Richard Garbs. 23c (is. 6d.)
27. Martin Luther. By Gustav Freytag. 23c (is. 6d.).
28. English Secularism. By George Jacob Holyoake. 23c (is. 6d.).
29. On Orthogenesis. By Th. Eimer. 23c (is. 6d.).
30. Chinese Philosophy. By Paul Carus. 23c (xs. 6d.).
31. The Lost Manuscript. By Gustav Freytag. 60c (3s.).
32. A Mechanico-Phyttological Theory qf Organic Evolution. By Carl von Nakgkli. 15c (9d.).
33. Chine** Fiction. By Dr. GsoRGB T. Candlin. 15c (gd.).
35. The Ethical Problem. By Paul Carus. 50c (as. 6d.).
36. Buddhism and Its Christian Critics. By Paul Carus. 50c (2s. 6d.}.
37. Psychology for Beginner*. By Hiram M. Stanley. 20c (xs.).
38. Discourse on Method. By Descartes. 25c (xs. 6d.).
39. The Dawn of a New Era. By Paul Carus. 13c fed.) 4a Kant and Spencer. By Paul Carus. 20c (is.).
41. The Soul of Man. By Paul Carus. 75c (3s. 6d.).
42. World's Congress Addresses. By C. C. Bonney. 15c fed.).
43. The Gospel According to Darwin. By Woods Hutchinson. 50c (as. 6d.).
44. Whence and Whither. By Paul Carus. 25c (xs. 6d.).
43. Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. By David Hume. 25c 46. Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals. By David Hums, 25c 47. The Psychology of Reasoning. By Alfred Binbt. 25c (is. 6d.).
48. The Principles of Human Knowledge. By George Berkeley. 2sc(is.6d.).
49. Three Dialogue* Between Hylat and Philonou*. By George Berkeley.
5a Public Worship: A Study in the Psychology of Religion. By John P.
Hylan. 25c (is. 6d.)« 51. Descartes* Meditations, with Selection* from the Principle*. 35c (2s.). 32. Leibniz'* Metaphysics, Correspondence, and Monadology. 30c (as.).
54. Ansetm's Proslogium, Monologium t and Cur Deus Homo. 50c (as. 6d.). ^55. The Canon of Reason and Virtue. By Dr. Paul Carus. 23c (xs. 6d.).
r "n