On the Progression of Animals
- Language:
- English
- Status:
- Complete work
- Authorship:
- Written by the author
- Condition of the text:
- No scanning noise detected (automatic measure over the whole text, not checked by hand)
- Extent:
- ~9,470 words · 45 passages
Cite this work
- APAAristotle. (n.d.). On the Progression of Animals. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/en/works/aristotle/on-the-progression-of-animals
- MLAAristotle. On the Progression of Animals. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/en/works/aristotle/on-the-progression-of-animals.
- ChicagoAristotle. On the Progression of Animals. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/en/works/aristotle/on-the-progression-of-animals.
Reference to the edition that SigPhi reproduces: SigPhi is its digital reproduction, not its publisher. The edition's year is not in the metadata (hence "n.d."), and the translator appears only when recorded.
What it is about
Why animals have the limbs they have, and why always in even numbers.
Context and history
Comparative anatomy before the name existed: it relates limb form to mode of locomotion and to environment. One of the texts where Aristotle the field observer is most visible.
Editorial context, not a citable source: unlike the passages of the work itself, these statements cannot be checked against the corpus.
Animals which, like men and birds, have the superior part distinguished from the front are two-footed (biped). In them, of the four points of motion, two are wings in the one, hands and arms in the other. Animals which have the superior and the front parts identically situated are four-footed, many-footed, or footless (quadruped, polypod, limbless). I use the term foot for a member employed for movement in place connected with a point on the ground, for the feet appear to have got their name from the ground under our feet. Some animals, too, have the front and back parts identically situated, for example, Cephalopods (molluscs) and spiral-shaped Testaceans, and these we have discussed elsewhere in another connexion. Now there is in place a superior, an intermediate, and an inferior; in respect to place bipeds have their superior part corresponding to the part of the universe; quadrupeds, polypods, and footless animals to the intermediate part, and plants to the inferior. The reason is that these have no power of locomotion, and the superior part is determined relatively to the nutriment, and their nutriment is from the earth. Quadrupeds, polypods, and footless animals again have their superior part corresponding to the intermediate, because they are not erect. Bipeds have theirs corresponding to the superior part of the universe because they are erect, and of bipeds, man par excellence; for man is the most natural of bipeds. And it is reasonable for the starting points to be in these parts; for the starting-point is honourable, and the superior is more honourable than the inferior, the front than the back, and the right than the left. Or we may reverse the argument and say quite well that these parts are more honourable than their opposites just because the starting-points are in them. Part 6
Ask about this workWhat is On the Progression of Animals about?Summarize On the Progression of Animals brieflyWhat are the key ideas in On the Progression of Animals?
← Back to Aristotle