SigPhiSigPhi

Cartas eruditas y curiosas, Vol. I (1773)

Benito Feijoo

Language:
Spanish
Status:
Selection or partial work
Authorship:
Written by the author
Condition of the text:
Some scanning errors (automatic measure over the whole text, not checked by hand) · 2 illegible passages, excluded from answers
Extent:
~170,000 words · 785 passages
Cite this work
  • APABenito Feijoo. (n.d.). Cartas eruditas y curiosas, Vol. I (1773). Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/en/works/benito-feijoo/cartas-eruditas-y-curiosas-vol-i-1773
  • MLABenito Feijoo. Cartas eruditas y curiosas, Vol. I (1773). Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/en/works/benito-feijoo/cartas-eruditas-y-curiosas-vol-i-1773.
  • ChicagoBenito Feijoo. Cartas eruditas y curiosas, Vol. I (1773). Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/en/works/benito-feijoo/cartas-eruditas-y-curiosas-vol-i-1773.

Reference to the edition that SigPhi reproduces: SigPhi is its digital reproduction, not its publisher. The edition's year is not in the metadata (hence "n.d."), and the translator appears only when recorded.

What it is about

The first volume of Feijoo's letters: short essays in epistolary form with which he tried to put science and critical judgement within reach of the eighteenth-century Spanish reader.

Context and history

Feijoo was a Benedictine and a professor at Oviedo, and he wrote in Spanish rather than Latin precisely because he wanted to reach those who had no Latin. The letters continue his 'Teatro crítico universal' with the same purpose: to take apart superstitions — miraculous cures, divination, folk remedies — to explain what European physics and medicine were discovering, and to defend positions that were costly at the time, such as the intellectual capacity of women. His method is always the same, and it is what makes him modern: faced with a claim, ask what the evidence is. This is one of the doors by which the Enlightenment entered Spain, and he had readers enough that the king forbade attacks on him.

Editorial context, not a citable source: unlike the passages of the work itself, these statements cannot be checked against the corpus.

How it begins
toda aquella variedad de primores , que constituyen un Orador perfecto , y que V.S. L. posec en el grado mas excelso, que aun al riesgo de parecer prolijo , resuelvo no omitirlos. Nam tu, sive libet pariter cum grandine nimbos, Densaque vibrata jaculari fulmina lingua, Seu iuvat adstrictas in nodum cogere voces, Et dare subtili vivacia verba catenz: -Vim Laertiade brevitatem vincis Átride. Dulcía seu mavis, liquidoque fluentia cursu. Verba , nec incluso, sed aperto pingere floxe. In- (IX) Inclyta Nestorei cedit tibi gratia mellis, oa ej o eli Eo a en 0 o 0. Mera “els. em 07 00... Qualis io superi, qualis nitor oris amoenis. Vocibus! hinc solido fulgore micantia verba Implevere locos : hinc exornata figuris Adyolar excusso velox sententia torno, No solo brilla en el Pulpito la singular eloquencia de V.S.I. en todas partes brilla , y siempre brilla. Si dentro del Templo da VS... aliento al clarin del Evangclio ; en las conversaciones privadas parece que suena cn sus labios la Lira de Arfon. Todo en Y. S. 1. es cloquencia , porque todas sus excelsas prendas conspiran a mover , a persuadir, a arrastrar. ¿Quién no se dexa encantar de esa len-- gua, que cxbala-Íuces , pronunciando letras ¿De ese harmonioso estilo , en quien halla sublimidad el mas discreto , y claridad el mas rudo? ¿De esas vivas expresiones , que, como en un espejo , presentan al alma los objetos? ¿De esa propricdad de voces , que no solo declara, mas ilumina los asuntos ? ¿De ese dulce despejo , con que finyen las clausulas , succediendose unas A otras sin tropiezo , y junta,

Read the full work →

← Back to Benito Feijoo