Commentaria in quatuor libros Sententiarum (Opera, tomus IV, ed. 1609)
- Language:
- Latin
- Status:
- Selection or partial work
- Authorship:
- Written by the author
- Condition of the text:
- Some scanning errors (automatic measure over the whole text, not checked by hand) · 2 illegible passages, excluded from answers
- Extent:
- ~510,000 words · 2,446 passages
Cite this work
- APABonaventure. (n.d.). Commentaria in quatuor libros Sententiarum (Opera, tomus IV, ed. 1609). Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/en/works/bonaventure/commentaria-in-quatuor-libros-sententiarum-opera-tomus-iv-ed-1609
- MLABonaventure. Commentaria in quatuor libros Sententiarum (Opera, tomus IV, ed. 1609). Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/en/works/bonaventure/commentaria-in-quatuor-libros-sententiarum-opera-tomus-iv-ed-1609.
- ChicagoBonaventure. Commentaria in quatuor libros Sententiarum (Opera, tomus IV, ed. 1609). Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/en/works/bonaventure/commentaria-in-quatuor-libros-sententiarum-opera-tomus-iv-ed-1609.
Reference to the edition that SigPhi reproduces: SigPhi is its digital reproduction, not its publisher. The edition's year is not in the metadata (hence "n.d."), and the translator appears only when recorded.
What it is about
Bonaventure's commentary on the Sentences of Peter Lombard, in the Latin edition of 1609.
Context and history
Commenting on the Sentences was what every candidate for a mastership in theology had to do: it was the required exercise, like a thesis today, which is why dozens of them exist. Bonaventure wrote his at Paris around 1250-1252, and Aquinas wrote his in the same years at the same university — read against each other, they show where the Franciscans and the Dominicans begin to part.
Editorial context, not a citable source: unlike the passages of the work itself, these statements cannot be checked against the corpus.
cileis animi compiseat,ac foztuul adzoetr auda deuot ionis pietatis f. dulcedine perfundat. Denique difWutationes omnes tum robore Aucoritatirquam non folum e fantfis Ecclefre veteribus patribus , fed etiam t l'eripateticia 4c Platontcis febolus alfa, dic iplinis ACCCpTEE UP v 4T ionum cómunimit «diurnentis. Hi ygitur deo ffrenut, 41ent ifümi obttmid, tbeologze [cbolasiice duces,etate equales,quaft eemini inChristofratres, g[/dem fludgs dedidiparid, corona condecoratiqui eximia fancl itatimaanam pv effantis docirina laudemadinanxerunt, cum vevirobur flabilierint theologie nertuseey hareticorum «udaciametuderint folidioribus artibus, prefforid, argumentandi acuere:diuint quidem cb peroportun? fafum es,vt bis luctuofifitmis temporibus.quibus mobilifd« tna prouincia olim fidei Catholica p florentiffüme Germania, Anglis Belgium, amplifimum Gallia reg: pum,t amio bere(umtempekiati ut turbulentig, fluctibus agitantur eo bereticaruns opinionum erróribus, quafi tribunit ys furoribm concutiuntur.optimum dotérine Catbolice ducem,ad berefes reflinquendas iuffruifüimi in acie Sanct iffimnus D. N perduceret.Is enim àprima etate theologia fIudys femper. floruit. tantus, in fis pfecityvt nemo vna aliqua tam perfecte fsentia didicerit quam ille omms prevellentis difciplinari corpi-) ) ) ) tonem eji adeptus. Diuinari autemrerb fcientia co illa ipfa fludia,que funt Chrif iamo bomine diana fit retfe| - Quouityvt non modo cum d5,qui noff ra memoria floruerunt comparandus ,. fed veteribus etiam illis Chriffiaue theologie principibus anmumerandas videatur Et quontam fi dotrine tnmocentia vite deesi propemodum bomini est frenilisque altero oculo captus fit..Scite enim apud Naz4anzenum er «ce feriprum eff : oi pd 9 9 (dior udn 71 À0J9Y RU TRR FUIXÓ TES TO £npo óc Aéfzroyrc ,oUÀEy TOY ense uua, £peoi dexéiv dia Diosa. Six 1s eit ur ,vt Vere dicam,cüm Qo tbevlogie perfetf ionem. facraruim litterarum perfeétam cogntionem.e [antie vita perfecfa|