The Foundations of the Origin of Species
- Language:
- English
- Status:
- Complete work
- Authorship:
- Written by the author
- Condition of the text:
- Clean text
- Extent:
- ~94,500 words · 449 passages
Cite this work
- APACharles Darwin. (n.d.). The Foundations of the Origin of Species. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/en/works/charles-darwin/the-foundations-of-the-origin-of-species
- MLACharles Darwin. "The Foundations of the Origin of Species." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/en/works/charles-darwin/the-foundations-of-the-origin-of-species.
- ChicagoCharles Darwin. The Foundations of the Origin of Species. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/en/works/charles-darwin/the-foundations-of-the-origin-of-species.
What it is about
The Foundations of the Origin of Species.
Context and history
The two sketches Darwin wrote in 1842 and 1844, published by his son Francis in 1909. He had the whole theory fifteen years before he published it, and left instructions and money for the 1844 essay to appear if he died. It is the document that shows what made him wait so long.
Editorial context, not a citable source: unlike the passages of the work itself, these statements cannot be checked against the corpus.
We know from the contents of Charles Darwin's Note Book of 1837 that he was at that time a convinced Evolutionist{1}. Nor can there be any doubt that, when he started on board the _Beagle_, such opinions as he had were on the side of immutability. When therefore did the current of his thoughts begin to set in the direction of Evolution? {1} See the extracts in _Life and Letters of Charles Darwin_, ii. p. 5. We have first to consider the factors that made for such a change. On his departure in 1831, Henslow gave him vol. I. of Lyell's _Principles_, then just published, with the warning that he was not to believe what he read{2}. But believe he did, and it is certain (as Huxley has forcibly pointed out{3}) that the doctrine of uniformitarianism when applied to Biology leads of necessity to Evolution. If the extermination of a species is no more catastrophic than the natural death of an individual, why should the birth of a species be any more miraculous than the birth of an individual? It is quite clear that this thought was vividly present to Darwin when he was writing out his early thoughts in the 1837 Note Book{4}:--"Propagation explains why modern animals same type as extinct, which is law almost proved. They die, without they change, like golden pippins; it is a _generation of species_ like generation _of individuals_." "If _species_ generate other _species_ their race is not utterly cut off." {2} The second volume,--especially important in regard to Evolution,--reached him in the autumn of 1832, as Prof. Judd has pointed out in his most interesting paper in _Darwin and Modern Science_. Cambridge, 1909. {3} Obituary Notice of C. Darwin, _Proc. R. Soc._ vol. 44. Reprinted in Huxley's _Collected Essays_. See also _Life and Letters of C. Darwin_, ii. p. 179. {4} See the extracts in the _Life and Letters_, ii. p. 5. These quotations show that he was struggling to see in the ori
What is The Foundations of the Origin of Species about?Summarize The Foundations of the Origin of Species brieflyWhat are the key ideas in The Foundations of the Origin of Species?
← Back to Charles Darwin