SigPhiSigPhi

The epistle of Othea to Hector; or, The boke of knyghthode

Christine de Pizan

Language:
English
Status:
Complete work
Authorship:
Written by the author
Condition of the text:
No scanning noise detected (automatic measure over the whole text, not checked by hand)
Extent:
~58,300 words · 277 passages
Cite this work
  • APAChristine de Pizan. (n.d.). The epistle of Othea to Hector; or, The boke of knyghthode. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/en/works/christine-de-pizan/the-epistle-of-othea-to-hector-or-the-boke-of-knyghthode
  • MLAChristine de Pizan. The epistle of Othea to Hector; or, The boke of knyghthode. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/en/works/christine-de-pizan/the-epistle-of-othea-to-hector-or-the-boke-of-knyghthode.
  • ChicagoChristine de Pizan. The epistle of Othea to Hector; or, The boke of knyghthode. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/en/works/christine-de-pizan/the-epistle-of-othea-to-hector-or-the-boke-of-knyghthode.

Reference to the edition that SigPhi reproduces: SigPhi is its digital reproduction, not its publisher. The edition's year is not in the metadata (hence "n.d."), and the translator appears only when recorded.

What it is about

The Epistle of Othea to Hector in Stephen Scrope's fifteenth-century English.

Context and history

It matters for the age of the translation: this is Middle English, made a few decades after the original. The catalogue also holds Christine's French, which is what should be cited.

Editorial context, not a citable source: unlike the passages of the work itself, these statements cannot be checked against the corpus.

How it begins
is not earlier than the latter part of the 15th century. This version is closely connected with that printed at Bruges in 1484 by Colard Mansion, who supposed the original author to have been, not Bersuire, but Thomas Waleys or de Galles. The two are, however, not quite identical, and the former possibly represents an older version, which Mansion revised for printing. But whatever the particular form of Ovid’s Metamorphoses which Christine utilized, her naive interpretations of his mythological tales are no doubt largely her own. In this respect she was certainly not in advance of her age. In the usual euhemeristic fashion she regarded the classical deities and demigods as men and women who by the “prerogative of some grace” had raised themselves above their fellows and were for this reason accorded divine honours; or, on the other hand, they were mere inventions of the poets, who, for instance, by inverting the process by which the planets were named from the gods, made gods of the planets. A fair sample of her method may be seen in the story of Perseus (p. 15). This hero, whose name, by the way, our English translator changed into that of the better known Arthurian Sir Perceval, was a “moult vaillant chevalier,” his steed Pegasus was “bonne renommée” or fame, which carried his name into all lands, and his deliverance of Andromeda teaches the aspirant to knighthood the duty of relieving all women in distress. So much may be learnt from the “glose”; but in the “allégorie” Pegasus becomes the spiritual knight’s good angel, “qui fera bon rapport de lui au jour de jugement,” while Andromeda is his soul, which he frees from the power of the fiend. With regard to the many personages and incidents from Trojan history introduced into the work, Christine’s authority was evidently a French prose romance which in a 15th century copy in the British Museum (Add. MS. 9,785) is entitled “La vraye ystoire de Troye.…

Read the full work →

← Back to Christine de Pizan