SigPhiSigPhi

Academica by Marcus Tullius Cicero

Cicero

Language:
Latin
Status:
Complete work
Authorship:
Written by the author
Condition of the text:
Some scanning errors (automatic measure over the whole text, not checked by hand) · 5 illegible passages, excluded from answers
Extent:
~110,000 words · 510 passages
Cite this work
  • APACicero. (n.d.). Academica by Marcus Tullius Cicero. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/en/works/cicero/academica-by-marcus-tullius-cicero
  • MLACicero. Academica by Marcus Tullius Cicero. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/en/works/cicero/academica-by-marcus-tullius-cicero.
  • ChicagoCicero. Academica by Marcus Tullius Cicero. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/en/works/cicero/academica-by-marcus-tullius-cicero.

Reference to the edition that SigPhi reproduces: SigPhi is its digital reproduction, not its publisher. The edition's year is not in the metadata (hence "n.d."), and the translator appears only when recorded.

What it is about

The English version of the 'Academica', for the reader; scholarly citation should point to the Latin.

Context and history

Written in 45 BC, this is Cicero's book on whether anything can be known: the defence of the scepticism of the New Academy, the school in which he had been formed. The quarrel is with the Stoics, who held that there are perceptions so clear they cannot deceive, and that the wise man may assent to them with certainty; against this Cicero deploys the arguments of Carneades — dreams, illusions, indistinguishable twins — to conclude that certainty is not to be had, and that what remains is not silence but the probable: one can live and decide by what is plausible without affirming it as certain. Cicero rewrote the whole work within a few weeks, which is why there are two editions, neither preserved complete. It is the principal source for the whole Hellenistic debate on knowledge, and when Augustine set out to fight scepticism, it was against this book that he wrote.

Editorial context, not a citable source: unlike the passages of the work itself, these statements cannot be checked against the corpus.

How it begins
accomplished men of his time, and Cicero's feelings towards him were those of gratitude, esteem, and admiration.[8] In the year 88 B.C. the celebrated Philo of Larissa, then head of the Academic school, came to Rome, one of a number of eminent Greeks who fled from Athens on the approach of its siege during the Mithridatic war. Philo, like Diodotus, was a man of versatile genius: unlike the Stoic philosopher, he was a perfect master both of the theory and the practice of oratory. Cicero had scarcely heard him before all inclination for Epicureanism was swept from his mind, and he surrendered himself wholly, as he tells us, to the brilliant Academic.[9] Smitten with a marvellous enthusiasm he abandoned all other studies for philosophy. His zeal was quickened by the conviction that the old judicial system of Rome was overthrown for ever, and that the great career once open to an orator was now barred.[10] We thus see that before Cicero was twenty years of age, he had been brought into intimate connection with at least three of the most eminent philosophers of the age, who represented the three most vigorous and important Greek schools. It is fair to conclude that he must have become thoroughly acquainted with their spirit, and with the main tenets of each. His own statements, after every deduction necessitated by his egotism has been made, leave no doubt about his diligence as a student. In his later works he often dwells on his youthful devotion to philosophy.[11] It would be unwise to lay too much stress on the intimate connection which subsisted between the rhetorical and the ethical teaching of the Greeks; but there can be little doubt that from the great rhetorician Molo, then Rhodian ambassador at Rome, Cicero gained valuable information concerning the ethical part of Greek philosophy. During the years 88--81 B.C., Cicero employed himself incessantly with the study of philosophy, law, rhetoric, and belles lettres.…

Read the full work →

← Back to Cicero