SigPhiSigPhi

Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion

David Hume

Language:
English
Status:
Complete work
Authorship:
Written by the author
Condition of the text:
Clean text
Extent:
~38,500 words · 183 passages
Cite this work
  • APADavid Hume. (n.d.). Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/en/works/david-hume/dialogues-concerning-natural-religion
  • MLADavid Hume. "Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/en/works/david-hume/dialogues-concerning-natural-religion.
  • ChicagoDavid Hume. Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/en/works/david-hume/dialogues-concerning-natural-religion.

What it is about

Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion: published in 1779, three years after his death.

Context and history

Hume kept them in a drawer for twenty-five years because he knew what they would cause, and arranged for them to appear posthumously. Three characters argue over whether the order of the world proves there is a God; the argument from design has never fully recovered.

Editorial context, not a citable source: unlike the passages of the work itself, these statements cannot be checked against the corpus.

It has been remarked, my HERMIPPUS, that though the ancient philosophers conveyed most of their instruction in the form of dialogue, this method of composition has been little practised in later ages, and has seldom succeeded in the hands of those who have attempted it. Accurate and regular argument, indeed, such as is now expected of philosophical inquirers, naturally throws a man into the methodical and didactic manner; where he can immediately, without preparation, explain the point at which he aims; and thence proceed, without interruption, to deduce the proofs on which it is established. To deliver a SYSTEM in conversation, scarcely appears natural; and while the dialogue-writer desires, by departing from the direct style of composition, to give a freer air to his performance, and avoid the appearance of Author and Reader, he is apt to run into a worse inconvenience, and convey the image of Pedagogue and Pupil. Or, if he carries on the dispute in the natural spirit of good company, by throwing in a variety of topics, and preserving a proper balance among the speakers, he often loses so much time in preparations and transitions, that the reader will scarcely think himself compensated, by all the graces of dialogue, for the order, brevity, and precision, which are sacrificed to them. There are some subjects, however, to which dialogue-writing is peculiarly adapted, and where it is still preferable to the direct and simple method of composition. Any point of doctrine, which is so obvious that it scarcely admits of dispute, but at the same time so important that it cannot be too often inculcated, seems to require some such method of handling it; where the novelty of the manner may compensate the triteness of the subject; where the vivacity of conversation may enforce the precept; and where the variety of lights, presented by various personages and characters, m

Read the full work →

← Back to David Hume