SigPhiSigPhi

Rules for the Direction of the Mind

Descartes

Language:
English
Status:
Complete work
Authorship:
Written by the author
Condition of the text:
Clean text
Extent:
~10,300 words · 49 passages
Cite this work
  • APADescartes. (n.d.). Rules for the Direction of the Mind. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/en/works/descartes/rules-for-the-direction-of-the-mind
  • MLADescartes. "Rules for the Direction of the Mind." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/en/works/descartes/rules-for-the-direction-of-the-mind.
  • ChicagoDescartes. Rules for the Direction of the Mind. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/en/works/descartes/rules-for-the-direction-of-the-mind.

What it is about

Rules for the Direction of the Mind: written around 1628 and never published in his lifetime.

Context and history

Descartes's method in its first and most technical form, before the Discourse made it readable for everyone. It breaks off at rule twenty-one. English translation; the Latin original is not in the catalogue.

Editorial context, not a citable source: unlike the passages of the work itself, these statements cannot be checked against the corpus.

The aim of our studies should be to direct the mind with a view to forming true and sound judgements about whatever comes before it. Rule II We should attend only to those objects of which our minds seem capable of having certain and indubitable cognition. Rule III Concerning objects proposed for study, we ought to investigate what we can clearly and evidently intuit or deduce with certainty, and not what other people have thought or what we ourselves conjecture. For knowledge can be attained in no other way. We must read the works of the ancients; for it is an extraordinary advantage to have available the labors of so many men, both in order to recognize what true discoveries have already long since been made and -also to become aware of what scope is still left for invention in the various disciplines. There is, however; at the same time a great danger that perhaps some contagion of error, contracted from a too attentive reading of them, may stick to us against our will, in spite of all precautions. For authors are ordinarily so disposed that whenever their heedless credulity has led them to a decision on some controverted opinion, they always try to bring us over to the same side, with the subtlest arguments; if on the other hand they have been fortunate enough to discover something certain and evident, they never set it forth without wrapping it up in all sorts of complications. (I suppose they are afraid that a simple account may lessen the importance they gain by the discovery ; or perhaps they begrudge us the plain truth.)

Read the full work →

← Back to Descartes