SigPhiSigPhi

My Disillusionment in Russia

Emma Goldman

Language:
English
Status:
Complete work
Authorship:
Written by the author
Condition of the text:
No scanning noise detected (automatic measure over the whole text, not checked by hand)
Extent:
~53,300 words · 253 passages
Cite this work
  • APAEmma Goldman. (n.d.). My Disillusionment in Russia. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/en/works/emma-goldman/my-disillusionment-in-russia
  • MLAEmma Goldman. My Disillusionment in Russia. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/en/works/emma-goldman/my-disillusionment-in-russia.
  • ChicagoEmma Goldman. My Disillusionment in Russia. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/en/works/emma-goldman/my-disillusionment-in-russia.

Reference to the edition that SigPhi reproduces: SigPhi is its digital reproduction, not its publisher. The edition's year is not in the metadata (hence "n.d."), and the translator appears only when recorded.

What it is about

Goldman in Soviet Russia (1920–1921): she arrived deported from the United States and a supporter of the Revolution, and left horrified.

Context and history

One of the first critical accounts of Bolshevism written from the left, and therefore uncomfortable for everyone: the right did not want the anarchist and the left did not want the critique. The title is not hers but the publisher's, and she hated it.

Editorial context, not a citable source: unlike the passages of the work itself, these statements cannot be checked against the corpus.

How it begins
Revolution." Here I have in mind the sincere friends of the Russian Revolution. The work of most of them has resulted in incalculable confusion and mischief. They have helped to perpetuate the myth that the Bolsheviki and the Revolution are synonymous. Yet nothing is further from the truth. The _actual_ Russian Revolution took place in the summer months of 1917. During that period the peasants possessed themselves of the land, the workers of the factories, thus demonstrating that they knew well the meaning of social revolution. The October change was the finishing touch to the work begun six months previously. In the great uprising the Bolsheviki assumed the voice of the people. They clothed themselves with the agrarian programme of the Social Revolutionists and the industrial tactics of the Anarchists. But after the high tide of revolutionary enthusiasm had carried them into power, the Bolsheviki discarded their false plumes. It was then that began the spiritual separation between the Bolsheviki and the Russian Revolution. With each succeeding day the gap grew wider, their interests more conflicting. To-day it is no exaggeration to state that the Bolsheviki stand as the arch enemies of the Russian Revolution. Superstitions die hard. In the case of this modern superstition the process is doubly hard because various factors have combined to administer artificial respiration. International intervention, the blockade, and the very efficient world propaganda of the Communist Party have kept the Bolshevik myth alive. Even the terrible famine is being exploited to that end. How powerful a hold that superstition wields I realize from my own experience. I had always known that the Bolsheviki are Marxists. For thirty years I fought the Marxian theory as a cold, mechanistic, enslaving formula. In pamphlets, lectures, and debates I argued against it. I was therefore not unaware of what might be expected from the Bolsheviki.…

Read the full work →

← Back to Emma Goldman