Principal Doctrines
- Language:
- English
- Status:
- Complete work
- Authorship:
- Written by the author
- Condition of the text:
- No scanning noise detected (automatic measure over the whole text, not checked by hand)
- Extent:
- ~1,900 words · 9 passages
Cite this work
- APAEpicurus. (n.d.). Principal Doctrines. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/en/works/epicurus/principal-doctrines
- MLAEpicurus. Principal Doctrines. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/en/works/epicurus/principal-doctrines.
- ChicagoEpicurus. Principal Doctrines. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/en/works/epicurus/principal-doctrines.
Reference to the edition that SigPhi reproduces: SigPhi is its digital reproduction, not its publisher. The edition's year is not in the metadata (hence "n.d."), and the translator appears only when recorded.
What it is about
The Principal Doctrines: forty sentences to be learned by heart.
Context and history
Epicureans memorised them, which is why they survive. The first denies that the gods concern themselves with us; the second, that death affects us. Diogenes Laertius copied them out in full, and that is the only reason we have them.
Editorial context, not a citable source: unlike the passages of the work itself, these statements cannot be checked against the corpus.
7. Some people have sought to become famous and renowned, thinking that thus they would make themselves secure against their fellow-humans. If, then, the life of such persons really was secure, they attained natural good; if, however, it was insecure, they have not attained the end which by nature's own prompting they originally sought. 8. No pleasure is in itself evil, but the things which produce certain pleasures entail annoyances many times greater than the pleasures themselves. 9. If all pleasure had been capable of accumulation, -- if this had gone on not only be recurrences in time, but all over the frame or, at any rate, over the principal parts of human nature, there would never have been any difference between one pleasure and another, as in fact there is. 10. If the objects which are productive of pleasures to profligate persons really freed them from fears of the mind, -- the fears, I mean, inspired by celestial and atmospheric phenomena, the fear of death, the fear of pain; if, further, they taught them to limit their desires, we should never have any fault to find with such persons, for they would then be filled with pleasures to overflowing on all sides and would be exempt from all pain, whether of body or mind, that is, from all evil. 11. If we had never been molested by alarms at celestial and atmospheric phenomena, nor by the misgiving that death somehow affects us, nor by neglect of the proper limits of pains and desires, we should have had no need to study natural science. 12. It would be impossible to banish fear on matters of the highest importance, if a person did not know the nature of the whole universe, but lived in dread of what the legends tell us. Hence without the study of nature there was no enjoyment of unmixed pleasures. 13.…
Ask about this workWhat is Principal Doctrines about?Summarize Principal Doctrines brieflyWhat are the key ideas in Principal Doctrines?
← Back to Epicurus