SigPhiSigPhi

The Complaint of Peace

Erasmus

Language:
English
Status:
Complete work
Authorship:
Written by the author
Condition of the text:
No scanning noise detected (automatic measure over the whole text, not checked by hand)
Extent:
~24,600 words · 117 passages
Cite this work
  • APAErasmus. (n.d.). The Complaint of Peace. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/en/works/erasmus/the-complaint-of-peace
  • MLAErasmus. The Complaint of Peace. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/en/works/erasmus/the-complaint-of-peace.
  • ChicagoErasmus. The Complaint of Peace. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/en/works/erasmus/the-complaint-of-peace.

Reference to the edition that SigPhi reproduces: SigPhi is its digital reproduction, not its publisher. The edition's year is not in the metadata (hence "n.d."), and the translator appears only when recorded.

What it is about

The Complaint of Peace (1517): Peace herself protests at being driven out everywhere.

Context and history

Written on the eve of the wars of religion, commissioned by a Burgundian chancellor who wanted an argument against war. Erasmus's point is that war between Christians is always a civil war — the argument that set half the continent against him. An English translation. Erasmus's Latin, which is what should be cited, is in the catalogue only in the anthology of epistles.

Editorial context, not a citable source: unlike the passages of the work itself, these statements cannot be checked against the corpus.

How it begins
In living bodies, how all the various limbs harmonize, and mutually combine, for common defence against injury! What can be more heterogeneous, and unlike, than the body and the soul? and yet with what strong bonds nature has united them, is evident from the pang of separation. As life itself is nothing else but the concordant union of body and soul, so is health the harmonious cooperation of all the parts and functions of the body. Animals destitute of reason live with their own kind in a state of social amity. Elephants herd together; sheep and swine feed in flocks; cranes and crows take their flight in troops; storks have their public meetings to consult previously to their emigration, and feed their parents when unable to feed themselves; dolphins defend each other by mutual assistance; and everybody knows, that both ants and bees have respectively established by general agreement, a little friendly community. But I need dwell no longer on animals, which, though they want reason, are evidently furnished with sense. In trees and plants one may trace the vestiges of amity and love. Many of them are barren, unless the male plant is placed on their vicinity. The vine embraces the elm, and other plants cling to the vine. So that things which have no powers of sense to perceive any thing else, seem strongly to feel the advantages of union. But plants, though they have not powers of perception, yet, as they have life, certainly approach very nearly to those things which are endowed with sentient faculties. What then is so completely insensible as stony substance? yet even in this, there appears to be a desire of union. Thus the loadstone attracts iron to it, and holds it fast in its embrace, when so attracted. Indeed, the attraction of cohesion, as a law of love, takes place throughout all inanimate nature. I need not repeat, that the most savage of the savage tribes in the forest, live among each other in amity. Lions show no fierceness to the lion race.…

Read the full work →

← Back to Erasmus