SigPhiSigPhi

Revolution and Counter-Revolution; Or, Germany in 1848

Friedrich Engels

Language:
English
Status:
Complete work
Authorship:
Written by the author
Condition of the text:
No scanning noise detected (automatic measure over the whole text, not checked by hand)
Extent:
~46,900 words · 223 passages
Cite this work
  • APAFriedrich Engels. (n.d.). Revolution and Counter-Revolution; Or, Germany in 1848. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/en/works/friedrich-engels/revolution-and-counter-revolution-or-germany-in-1848
  • MLAFriedrich Engels. Revolution and Counter-Revolution; Or, Germany in 1848. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/en/works/friedrich-engels/revolution-and-counter-revolution-or-germany-in-1848.
  • ChicagoFriedrich Engels. Revolution and Counter-Revolution; Or, Germany in 1848. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/en/works/friedrich-engels/revolution-and-counter-revolution-or-germany-in-1848.

Reference to the edition that SigPhi reproduces: SigPhi is its digital reproduction, not its publisher. The edition's year is not in the metadata (hence "n.d."), and the translator appears only when recorded.

What it is about

Revolution and Counter-Revolution in Germany (1851–52).

Context and history

They appeared as articles in the New York Tribune under Marx's name, who had no time to write them; Engels did. This is immediate history: an analysis of why the German revolution of 1848 failed, written by someone who had fought in it with a rifle. An English translation. Engels's German original is not in the catalogue.

Editorial context, not a citable source: unlike the passages of the work itself, these statements cannot be checked against the corpus.

How it begins
peasantry and farm laborers, for obvious reasons found in an alliance with the anti-feudal middle class of the towns its most natural political course. Then there were, secondly, the small freeholders, predominating in the Rhine country, where feudalism had succumbed before the mighty strokes of the great French Revolution. Similar independent small freeholders also existed here and there in other provinces, where they had succeeded in buying off the feudal charges formerly due upon their lands. This class, however, was a class of freeholders by name only, their property being generally mortgaged to such an extent, and under such onerous conditions, that not the peasant, but the usurer who had advanced the money, was the real landowner. Thirdly, the feudal tenants, who could not be easily turned out of their holdings, but who had to pay a perpetual rent, or to perform in perpetuity a certain amount of labor in favor of the lord of the manor. Lastly, the agricultural laborers, whose condition, in many large farming concerns, was exactly that of the same class in England, and who in all cases lived and died poor, ill-fed, and the slaves of their employers. These three latter classes of the agricultural population, the small freeholders, the feudal tenants, and the agricultural laborers, never troubled their heads much about politics before the Revolution, but it is evident that this event must have opened to them a new career, full of brilliant prospects. To every one of them the Revolution offered advantages, and the movement once fairly engaged in, it was to be expected that each, in their turn, would join it.…

Read the full work →

← Back to Friedrich Engels