SigPhiSigPhi

The origin of the family, private property, and the state

Friedrich Engels

Language:
English
Status:
Complete work
Authorship:
Written by the author
Condition of the text:
Clean text
Extent:
~68,800 words · 327 passages
Cite this work
  • APAFriedrich Engels. (n.d.). The origin of the family, private property, and the state. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/en/works/friedrich-engels/the-origin-of-the-family-private-property-and-the-state
  • MLAFriedrich Engels. "The origin of the family, private property, and the state." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/en/works/friedrich-engels/the-origin-of-the-family-private-property-and-the-state.
  • ChicagoFriedrich Engels. The origin of the family, private property, and the state. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/en/works/friedrich-engels/the-origin-of-the-family-private-property-and-the-state.

What it is about

The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State (1884).

Context and history

Written from the notebooks Marx left at his death on the anthropologist Lewis Morgan. The thesis — that the monogamous family and the state arise with property and are not natural — gave twentieth-century feminism one of its central arguments. The ethnography it rests on has dated; the argument has not. An English translation. Engels's German original is not in the catalogue.

Editorial context, not a citable source: unlike the passages of the work itself, these statements cannot be checked against the corpus.

The following chapters are, in a certain sense, executing a bequest. It was no less a man than Karl Marx who had reserved to himself the privilege of displaying the results of Morgan's investigations in connection with his own materialistic conception of history--which I might call ours within certain limits. He wished thus to elucidate the full meaning of this conception. For in America, Morgan had, in a manner, discovered anew the materialistic conception of history, originated by Marx forty years ago. In comparing barbarism and civilization, he had arrived, in the main, at the same results as Marx. And just as "Capital" was zealously plagiarized and persistently passed over in silence by the professional economists in Germany, so Morgan's "Ancient Society"[1] was treated by the spokesmen of "prehistoric" science in England. My work can offer only a meager substitute for that which my departed friend was not destined to accomplish. But in his copious extracts from Morgan, I have critical notes which I herewith reproduce as fully as feasible. According to the materialistic conception, the decisive element of history is pre-eminently the production and reproduction of life and its material requirements. This implies, on the one hand, the production of the means of existence (food, clothing, shelter and the necessary tools); on the other hand, the generation of children, the propagation of the species. The social institutions, under which the people of a certain historical period and of a certain country are living, are dependent on these two forms of production; partly on the development of labor, partly on that of the family. The less labor is developed, and the less abundant the quantity of its production and, therefore, the wealth of society, the more society is seen to be under the domination of sexual ties. However, under this formation based on sexual ties, the productivity of labor is

Read the full work →

← Back to Friedrich Engels