Reflections on Violence (ed. 2)
- Language:
- English
- Translation:
- T. E. Hulme
- Status:
- Complete work
- Authorship:
- Written by the author
- Condition of the text:
- Clean text
- Extent:
- ~110,000 words · 541 passages
Cite this work
- APAGeorges Sorel. (n.d.). Reflections on Violence (ed. 2). SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/en/works/georges-sorel/reflections-on-violence
- MLAGeorges Sorel. "Reflections on Violence (ed. 2)." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/en/works/georges-sorel/reflections-on-violence.
- ChicagoGeorges Sorel. Reflections on Violence (ed. 2). SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/en/works/georges-sorel/reflections-on-violence.
What it is about
The 1908 book in which Sorel defends the general strike not as a tactic but as a myth: an image that moves men to act even though it need never come about as they picture it.
Context and history
It is one of the most uncomfortable texts in the corpus, and it is worth saying why. Sorel came out of Marxism and found it too rationalist: he held that masses are moved not by calculation but by total images, and that revolutionary syndicalism should preserve its capacity for conflict instead of bargaining it away. He distinguished proletarian 'violence' from the 'force' of the state, and despised parliamentary democracy as a way of damping conflict down. These ideas were taken up both by the syndicalist left and by Italian fascism, and Sorel himself sympathised with Lenin at the end of his life. It is in the corpus because it is a real piece of the history of ideas, and it should be read knowing where it led.
Editorial context, not a citable source: unlike the passages of the work itself, these statements cannot be checked against the corpus.
My dear Halevy — I should doubtless have left these studies buried in the bound volumes of a review if some friends, whose judgment I value, had not. thought that it would be a good thing to bring them before the notice of a wider public, as they serve to make better known one of the most singular social phenomena that history records. But it seemed to me that it would be necessary to give this public some additional explanations, since I cannot often expect to find judges as indulgent as you have been. When I published, in the Mouvement Socialiste, the articles which are now collected in this volume, I did not write with the intention of composing a book : I simply wrote down my reflections as they came into my mind. I knew that the subscribers to that review would have no difficulty in following me, since they were already famiHar with the theories, which for some years my friends and I had developed in its pages. But I am convinced that the readers of this book, on the contrary, will be very bewildered if I do not submit a kind of defence which will enable them to consider things from my own habitual point of view. In the course of our conversations, you have sometimes made remarks which fitted so well into the system of my own ideas that they often led me to investigate certain questions more thoroughly. I am sure that the reflections which I here submit to you, and which you have provoked, will be very useful to those who wish to read this book with profit. There are perhaps few studies in which the defects of my method of writing are more evident ; I have been frequently reproached for not respecting the rules of the art of writing, to which all our contemporaries submit, and for thus inconveniencing my readers by the disorder of my explanations. I have tried to render the text clearer by numerous corrections of detail, but I have not been able to make the disorder disappear. I do not wish to defend myself by pleading the example of great writ