SigPhiSigPhi

Laughter

Henri Bergson

Language:
English
Status:
Complete work
Authorship:
Written by the author
Condition of the text:
No scanning noise detected (automatic measure over the whole text, not checked by hand)
Extent:
~42,500 words · 202 passages
Cite this work
  • APAHenri Bergson. (n.d.). Laughter. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/en/works/henri-bergson/laughter
  • MLAHenri Bergson. Laughter. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/en/works/henri-bergson/laughter.
  • ChicagoHenri Bergson. Laughter. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/en/works/henri-bergson/laughter.

Reference to the edition that SigPhi reproduces: SigPhi is its digital reproduction, not its publisher. The edition's year is not in the metadata (hence "n.d."), and the translator appears only when recorded.

What it is about

Laughter (1900): what makes something funny.

Context and history

Bergson's answer: we laugh when a person behaves like a machine — rigid, repetitive, unable to adapt. Laughter is society's punishment for inflexibility. **Warning: the catalogue also holds 'Laughter: An Essay on the Meaning of the Comic', which is the SAME work**; whether they are the same translation has not been checked. The case is open.

Editorial context, not a citable source: unlike the passages of the work itself, these statements cannot be checked against the corpus.

How it begins
acter that the rigidity of a fixed idea has to intellect? Whether as a moral kink or a crooked twist given to the will, vice has often the appearance of a curvature of the soul. Doubtless there are vices into which the soul plunges deeply with all its pregnant potency, which it rejuvenates and drags along with it into a moving circle of reincarnations. Those are tragic vices. But the vice capable of making us comic is, on the contrary, that which is brought from without, like a ready-made frame into which we are to step. It lends us its own rigidity instead of borrowing from us our flexibility. We do not render it more complicated ; on the contrary, it simplifies us. Here, as we shall see later on in the conclud¬ ing section of this study, lies the essential difference between comedy and drama. A drama, even when portraying passions or vices that bear a name, so completely incorporates them in the person that their names are for¬ gotten, their general characteristics effaced, and we no longer think of them at all, but rather of the person in whom they are assimilated ; hence, the title of a drama can seldom be any¬ thing else than a proper noun.…

Read the full work →

← Back to Henri Bergson