Essays on Education and Kindred Subjects
- Language:
- English
- Status:
- Complete work
- Authorship:
- Written by the author
- Condition of the text:
- No scanning noise detected (automatic measure over the whole text, not checked by hand)
- Extent:
- ~190,000 words · 902 passages
Cite this work
- APAHerbert Spencer. (n.d.). Essays on Education and Kindred Subjects. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/en/works/herbert-spencer/essays-on-education-and-kindred-subjects
- MLAHerbert Spencer. Essays on Education and Kindred Subjects. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/en/works/herbert-spencer/essays-on-education-and-kindred-subjects.
- ChicagoHerbert Spencer. Essays on Education and Kindred Subjects. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/en/works/herbert-spencer/essays-on-education-and-kindred-subjects.
Reference to the edition that SigPhi reproduces: SigPhi is its digital reproduction, not its publisher. The edition's year is not in the metadata (hence "n.d."), and the translator appears only when recorded.
What it is about
Spencer's four essays on education, of 1861, headed by the one asking what knowledge is of most worth, which helped push Latin out of the centre of the school.
Context and history
Spencer's answer is 'science', and the argument is not one of taste but of function: if education is to prepare for living, subjects must be ranked by which vital activity they serve — self-preservation, earning a living, rearing children, citizenship, leisure — and the classical languages come last. The other essays deal with intellectual, moral and physical education, and defend positions that were then in the minority: less memorising and more observation, no corporal punishment, exercise and open air for girls as well as boys. The book was very influential in the nineteenth century; read today, one sees both what it won and what its hierarchy left out.
Editorial context, not a citable source: unlike the passages of the work itself, these statements cannot be checked against the corpus.
This doctrine was extremely repulsive to the established profession of education in England, where Latin, Greek, and mathematics had been the staples of education for many generations, and were believed to afford the only suitable preparation for the learned professions, public life, and cultivated society. In proclaiming this doctrine with ample illustration, ingenious argument, and forcible reiteration, Spencer was a true educational pioneer, although some of his scientific contemporaries were really preaching similar doctrines, each in his own field. The profession of teaching has long been characterised by certain habitual convictions, which Spencer undertook to shake rudely, and even to deride. The first of these convictions is that all education, physical, intellectual, and moral, must be authoritative, and need take no account of the natural wishes, tendencies, and motives of the ignorant and undeveloped child. The second dominating conviction is that to teach means to tell, or show, children what they ought to see, believe, and utter. Expositions by the teacher and books are therefore the true means of education. The third and supreme conviction is that the method of education which produced the teacher himself and the contemporary or earlier scholars, authors, and publicists, must be the righteous and sufficient method. Its fruits demonstrate its soundness, and make it sacred. Herbert Spencer, in the essays included in the present volume, assaulted all three of these firm convictions.