SigPhiSigPhi

Social Statics

Herbert Spencer

Language:
English
Status:
Complete work
Authorship:
Written by the author
Condition of the text:
No scanning noise detected (automatic measure over the whole text, not checked by hand)
Extent:
~200,000 words · 948 passages
Cite this work
  • APAHerbert Spencer. (n.d.). Social Statics. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/en/works/herbert-spencer/social-statics
  • MLAHerbert Spencer. Social Statics. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/en/works/herbert-spencer/social-statics.
  • ChicagoHerbert Spencer. Social Statics. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/en/works/herbert-spencer/social-statics.

Reference to the edition that SigPhi reproduces: SigPhi is its digital reproduction, not its publisher. The edition's year is not in the metadata (hence "n.d."), and the translator appears only when recorded.

What it is about

Spencer's first book: a defence of individual liberty pushed as far as it will go, with the 'law of equal freedom' — each may do as he wills so long as he does not infringe the equal freedom of another — as its single principle.

Context and history

Published in 1851. It contains a famous chapter, 'The Right to Ignore the State', arguing that anyone renouncing public benefits should be able to withdraw from it entirely. Spencer removed that chapter from the revised edition of 1892, forty years later. This is worth knowing: a citation should say which edition it uses, because the two do not say the same thing.

Editorial context, not a citable source: unlike the passages of the work itself, these statements cannot be checked against the corpus.

How it begins
Even were the fundamental proposition of the expediency system not thus vitiated by the indefiniteness of its terms, it would still be vulnerable. Granting for the sake of argument, that the desideratum, "greatest happiness," is duly comprehended, its identity and nature agreed upon by all, and the direction in which it has satisfactorily settled, there yet remains the unwarranted assumption that it is possible for the self-guided human judgment to determine, with something like precision, by what methods it may be achieved. Experience daily proves that just the same uncertainty which exists respecting the specific ends to be obtained, exists hkewise respecting the right mode of attaining them when supposed to be known. In their attempts to compass one after another the several items which go to make up the grand total, " greatest happiness," men have been anything but successful ; their most promising measures having commonly turned out the greatest failures. Let us look at a few cases. When it was enacted in Bavaria that no marriage should be allowed between parties without capital, unless certain authorities could " see a reasonable prospect of the parties being able to provide for their children," it was doubtless intended to advance the pubUc weal by checking improvident unions, and redundant population; a purpose most pohticians will consider praiseworthy, and a provision which many will think well adapted to secure it. Nevertheless this apparently sagacious measure has by no means answered its end; the fact being that in Munich, the capital ^of the kingdom, half the births are illegitimate !

Read the full work →

← Back to Herbert Spencer