Eloisa or, A series of original letters
- Language:
- English
- Status:
- Complete work
- Authorship:
- Written by the author
- Condition of the text:
- Clean text
- Extent:
- ~310,000 words · 1,496 passages
Cite this work
- APAJean-Jacques Rousseau. (n.d.). Eloisa or, A series of original letters. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/en/works/jean-jacques-rousseau/eloisa-or-a-series-of-original-letters
- MLAJean-Jacques Rousseau. "Eloisa or, A series of original letters." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/en/works/jean-jacques-rousseau/eloisa-or-a-series-of-original-letters.
- ChicagoJean-Jacques Rousseau. Eloisa or, A series of original letters. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/en/works/jean-jacques-rousseau/eloisa-or-a-series-of-original-letters.
What it is about
A novel in letters: Julie and her tutor Saint-Preux love each other, rank forbids it, and she marries Wolmar and tries to rebuild a life around duty.
Context and history
It appeared in 1761 as Julie, ou la Nouvelle Héloïse and became the best-selling book of the century: readers are on record writing to Rousseau in tears, asking whether Julie had really lived. This is an eighteenth-century English translation, in which the novel is called Eloisa; for citing Rousseau, the text is the French.
Editorial context, not a citable source: unlike the passages of the work itself, these statements cannot be checked against the corpus.
Great cities require public theatres, and romances are necessary to a corrupt people. I saw the manners of the times, and have published these letters. Would to heaven I had lived in an age when I ought rather to have thrown them in the fire! Though I appear only as the editor of this work, I confess that I have had some share in the composition. But am I the sole author, and is the entire correspondence fictitious? Ye people of the world, of what importance is it to you? Certainly, to you, it is all a fiction. Every honest man will avow the books which he publishes. I have prefixed my name to these letters, not with a design to appropriate them to myself, but that I might be answerable for them. If they deserve censure, let it fall on me; if they have any merit, I am not ambitious of the praise. If it is a bad book, I am the more obliged to own it: I do not wish to pass for better than I am. As to the reality of the history, I declare that, though I have been several times in the country of the two lovers, I never heard either of Baron D’Etange, his daughter, Mr. Orbe, Lord B----, or Mr. Wolmar. I must also inform the reader that there are several topographical errors in this work; but whether they are the effect of ignorance or design, I leave undetermined. This is all I am at liberty to say: let every one think as he pleases. The book seems not calculated for an extensive circulation, as it is not adapted to the generality of readers. The stile will offend people of taste, to austere men the matter will be alarming, and all the sentiments will seem unnatural to those who know not what is meant by the word virtue. It ought to dis
What is Eloisa or, A series of original letters about?Summarize Eloisa or, A series of original letters brieflyWhat are the key ideas in Eloisa or, A series of original letters?
← Back to Jean-Jacques Rousseau