Of the Levelling System
- Language:
- English
- Status:
- Complete work
- Authorship:
- Written by the author
- Condition of the text:
- No scanning noise detected (automatic measure over the whole text, not checked by hand)
- Extent:
- ~7,160 words · 34 passages
Cite this work
- APAJeremy Bentham. (n.d.). Of the Levelling System. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/en/works/jeremy-bentham/of-the-levelling-system
- MLAJeremy Bentham. Of the Levelling System. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/en/works/jeremy-bentham/of-the-levelling-system.
- ChicagoJeremy Bentham. Of the Levelling System. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/en/works/jeremy-bentham/of-the-levelling-system.
Reference to the edition that SigPhi reproduces: SigPhi is its digital reproduction, not its publisher. The edition's year is not in the metadata (hence "n.d."), and the translator appears only when recorded.
What it is about
Of the Levelling System: on the equalisation of fortunes.
Context and history
Bentham asks whether redistributing wealth increases total happiness. The answer has two halves usually quoted apart: yes, because the same money is worth more to whoever has less of it; but not if it destroys the security of property, which he takes to be the condition of everything else.
Editorial context, not a citable source: unlike the passages of the work itself, these statements cannot be checked against the corpus.
many thousands of pounds to lend, so many thousands more than they have need to employ otherwise. Upon the equalisation scheme, all these monied men would be no more: nobody would have any thing he could spare for any length of time, much less for ever; no man would have any thing but from hand to mouth. As to the gainers — (I speak always of the immediate and momentary gainers, for ultimately, as we shall see, there would scarcely be a real gainer left in the nation) — as to the real gainers, if they were to be looked for any where, it would be in the class of the present day-labourers in husbandry. Their employment need not be changed; they would continue labourers in husbandry, with this comfortable difference, as it would be thought, of labouring upon, and for the benefit of their own property, instead of other people's. But even these would for the most part gain nothing but ruin by the change. Their fragments of farms having no buildings on them, would be useless to them till buildings could be erected. A man might farm profitably, and live comfortably a year or two hence, if he were then alive: but in the meantime he would not be able to farm or live at all. The immense multitude of new created farms, all of them without buildings, would require an immense and instant multiplication of the number of workmen concerned in building. But this number, instead of being multiplied, or so much as increased, would be as immediately and permanently reduced: for they too would have their portions, as well as the labourers in husbandry: if they laboured any longer, it would be upon their own property, not upon other people’s. If they laboured at all, what inducement would they have to labour upon other peoples property, or indeed for other people? What would they get by it? an
Ask about this workWhat is Of the Levelling System about?Summarize Of the Levelling System brieflyWhat are the key ideas in Of the Levelling System?
← Back to Jeremy Bentham