SigPhiSigPhi

Short Review of the Declaration

Jeremy Bentham

Language:
English
Status:
Complete work
Authorship:
Written by the author
Condition of the text:
No scanning noise detected (automatic measure over the whole text, not checked by hand)
Extent:
~4,630 words · 22 passages
Cite this work
  • APAJeremy Bentham. (n.d.). Short Review of the Declaration. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/en/works/jeremy-bentham/short-review-of-the-declaration
  • MLAJeremy Bentham. Short Review of the Declaration. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/en/works/jeremy-bentham/short-review-of-the-declaration.
  • ChicagoJeremy Bentham. Short Review of the Declaration. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/en/works/jeremy-bentham/short-review-of-the-declaration.

Reference to the edition that SigPhi reproduces: SigPhi is its digital reproduction, not its publisher. The edition's year is not in the metadata (hence "n.d."), and the translator appears only when recorded.

What it is about

Short Review of the Declaration: the answer to American independence (1776).

Context and history

Bentham applies to the Declaration of Independence the same razor he would later apply to the French rights: what exactly does each sentence assert, and is it true? A short and little-known text, useful for seeing how consistent he was.

Editorial context, not a citable source: unlike the passages of the work itself, these statements cannot be checked against the corpus.

How it begins
Yet they are about to change a Government, a Government whose establishment is coeval with their own existence as a Community. What causes do they assign? Circumstances which have always subsisted, which must continue to subsist, wherever Government has subsisted, or can subsist. For what, according to their own shewing, what was their original their only original grievance? That they were actually taxed more than they could bear? No; but that they were liable to be so taxed. What is the amount of all the subsequent grievances they alledge? That they were actually oppressed by Government? That Government has actually misused its power? No; but that it was possible that they might be oppressed; possible that Government might misuse its powers. Is there any where, can there be imagined any where, that Government, where subjects are not liable to taxed more than they can bear? where it is not possible that subjects may be oppressed, not possible that Government may misuse its powers? This I say, is the amount, the whole sum and substance of all their grievances. For in taking a general review of the charges brought against his Majesty, and his Parliament, we may observe that there is a studied confusion in the arrangement of them. It may therefore be worth while to reduce them to the several distinct heads, under which I should have classed them at the first, had not the order of the Answer been necessarily prescribed by the order — or rather the disorder, of the Declaration. The first head consists of Acts of Government, charged as so many acts of incroachment, so many usurpations upon the present King and his Parliaments exclusively, which had been constantly exercised by his Predecessors and their Parliaments.

Read the full work →

← Back to Jeremy Bentham