Creative Intelligence Essays in the Pragmatic Attitude
- Language:
- English
- Status:
- Complete work
- Authorship:
- Written by the author
- Condition of the text:
- No scanning noise detected (automatic measure over the whole text, not checked by hand)
- Extent:
- ~140,000 words · 646 passages
Cite this work
- APAJohn Dewey. (n.d.). Creative Intelligence Essays in the Pragmatic Attitude. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/en/works/john-dewey/creative-intelligence-essays-in-the-pragmatic-attitude
- MLAJohn Dewey. Creative Intelligence Essays in the Pragmatic Attitude. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/en/works/john-dewey/creative-intelligence-essays-in-the-pragmatic-attitude.
- ChicagoJohn Dewey. Creative Intelligence Essays in the Pragmatic Attitude. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/en/works/john-dewey/creative-intelligence-essays-in-the-pragmatic-attitude.
Reference to the edition that SigPhi reproduces: SigPhi is its digital reproduction, not its publisher. The edition's year is not in the metadata (hence "n.d."), and the translator appears only when recorded.
What it is about
The collective volume of 1917 in which Dewey and seven colleagues presented pragmatism as a programme for philosophy as a whole, not as a theory of truth.
Context and history
Dewey's opening essay, 'The Need for a Recovery of Philosophy', is among his clearest and harshest. He argues there that philosophy has spent centuries solving problems it made for itself — how to get out of the mind into the world, how to bridge the gulf between subject and object — and that these problems vanish if one stops assuming that knowing is contemplation and admits that it is a way of acting. The proposal is that philosophy should leave the problems of philosophers and take up the problems of men. The book appeared with the war in the background, and that gives it an urgency the 1903 'Studies' did not have.
Editorial context, not a citable source: unlike the passages of the work itself, these statements cannot be checked against the corpus.
Where there is life, there is a double connexion maintained with the environment. In part, environmental energies constitute organic functions; they enter into them. Life is not possible without such direct support by the environment. But while all organic changes depend upon the natural energies of the environment for their origination and occurrence, the natural energies sometimes carry the organic functions prosperously forward, and sometimes act counter to their continuance. Growth and decay, health and disease, are alike continuous with activities of the natural surroundings. The difference lies in the bearing of what happens upon future life-activity. From the standpoint of this future reference environmental incidents fall into groups: those favorable to life-activities, and those hostile. The successful activities of the organism, those within which environmental assistance is incorporated, react upon the environment to bring about modifications favorable to their own future. The human being has upon his hands the problem of responding to what is going on around him so that these changes will take one turn rather than another, namely, that required by its own further functioning. While backed in part by the environment, its life is anything but a peaceful exhalation of environment. It is obliged to struggle--that is to say, to employ the direct support given by the environment in order indirectly to effect changes that would not otherwise occur. In this sense, life goes on by means of controlling the environment. Its activities must change the changes going on around it; they must neutralize hostile occurrences; they must transform neutral events into cooeperative factors or into an efflorescence of new features. Dialectic developments of the notion of self-preservation, of the _conatus essendi_, often ignore all the important facts of the actual process.…