Reconstruction in Philosophy
- Language:
- English
- Status:
- Complete work
- Authorship:
- Written by the author
- Condition of the text:
- Clean text
- Extent:
- ~56,000 words · 266 passages
Cite this work
- APAJohn Dewey. (n.d.). Reconstruction in Philosophy. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/en/works/john-dewey/reconstruction-in-philosophy
- MLAJohn Dewey. "Reconstruction in Philosophy." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/en/works/john-dewey/reconstruction-in-philosophy.
- ChicagoJohn Dewey. Reconstruction in Philosophy. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/en/works/john-dewey/reconstruction-in-philosophy.
What it is about
Reconstruction in Philosophy (1920): what philosophy should stop doing and what it should start doing.
Context and history
Lectures given in Tokyo. His pragmatist statement of principle: philosophical problems come from real social conflicts, and treating them as eternal puzzles makes them insoluble by construction.
Editorial context, not a citable source: unlike the passages of the work itself, these statements cannot be checked against the corpus.
Being invited to lecture at the Imperial University of Japan in Tokyo during February and March of the present year, I attempted an interpretation of the reconstruction of ideas and ways of thought now going on in philosophy. While the lectures cannot avoid revealing the marks of the particular standpoint of their author, the aim is to exhibit the general contrasts between older and newer types of philosophic problems rather than to make a partisan plea in behalf of any one specific solution of these problems. I have tried for the most part to set forth the forces which make intellectual reconstruction inevitable and to prefigure some of the lines upon which it must proceed. Any one who has enjoyed the unique hospitality of Japan will be overwhelmed with confusion if he endeavors to make an acknowledgment in any way commensurate to the kindnesses he received. Yet I must set down in the barest of black and white my grateful appreciation of them, and in particular record my ineffaceable impressions of the courtesy and help of the members of the department of philosophy of Tokyo University, and of my dear friends Dr. Ono and Dr. Nitobe. J. D. September, 1919. RECONSTRUCTION IN PHILOSOPHY CHAPTER I CHANGING CONCEPTIONS OF PHILOSOPHY Man differs from the lower animals because he preserves his past experiences. What happened in the past is lived again in memory. About what goes on today hangs a cloud of thoughts concerning similar things undergone in bygone days. With the animals, an experience perishes as it happens, and each new doing or suffering stands alone. But man lives in a world where each occurrence is charged with echoes and reminiscences of what has gone before, where each event is a reminder of other things. Hence he lives not, like the beasts of the field, in a world of merely physical things but in a world of signs and symbols. A stone is not merely hard, a
What is Reconstruction in Philosophy about?Summarize Reconstruction in Philosophy brieflyWhat are the key ideas in Reconstruction in Philosophy?
← Back to John Dewey