SigPhiSigPhi

The Influence of Darwin on Philosophy, and other essays in contemporary thought

John Dewey

Language:
English
Status:
Complete work
Authorship:
Written by the author
Condition of the text:
Clean text
Extent:
~77,500 words · 368 passages
Cite this work
  • APAJohn Dewey. (n.d.). The Influence of Darwin on Philosophy, and other essays in contemporary thought. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/en/works/john-dewey/the-influence-of-darwin-on-philosophy-and-other-essays-in-contemporary-thought
  • MLAJohn Dewey. "The Influence of Darwin on Philosophy, and other essays in contemporary thought." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/en/works/john-dewey/the-influence-of-darwin-on-philosophy-and-other-essays-in-contemporary-thought.
  • ChicagoJohn Dewey. The Influence of Darwin on Philosophy, and other essays in contemporary thought. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/en/works/john-dewey/the-influence-of-darwin-on-philosophy-and-other-essays-in-contemporary-thought.

What it is about

The Influence of Darwin on Philosophy (1910) and other essays.

Context and history

The title essay is short and decisive: Dewey argues that Darwin changed not a theory but the way of asking, because he gave species — and therefore essences — a history. The rest of the volume is contemporary polemic.

Editorial context, not a citable source: unlike the passages of the work itself, these statements cannot be checked against the corpus.

An elaborate preface to a philosophic work usually impresses one as a last desperate effort on the part of its author to convey what he feels he has not quite managed to say in the body of his book. Nevertheless, a collection of essays on various topics written during a series of years may perhaps find room for an independent word to indicate the kind of unity they seem, to their writer, to possess. Probably every one acquainted with present philosophic thought--found, with some notable exceptions, in periodicals rather than in books--would term it a philosophy of transition and reconstruction. Its various representatives agree in what they oppose--the orthodox British empiricism of two generations ago and the orthodox Neo-Kantian idealism of the last generation--rather than in what they proffer. The essays of this volume belong, I suppose, to what has come to be known (since the earlier of them were written) as the pragmatic phase of the newer movement. Now a recent German critic has described pragmatism as, “Epistemologically, nominalism; psychologically, voluntarism; cosmologically, energism; metaphysically, agnosticism; ethically, meliorism on the basis of the Bentham-Mill utilitarianism.”[1] It may be that pragmatism will turn out to be all of this formidable array; but even should it, the one who thus defines it has hardly come within earshot of it. For whatever else pragmatism is or is not, the pragmatic spirit is primarily a revolt against that habit of mind which disposes of anything whatever--even so humble an affair as a new method in Philosophy--by tucking it away, after this fashion, in the pigeon holes of a filing cabinet. There are other vita

Read the full work →

← Back to John Dewey