SigPhiSigPhi

On Liberty

John Stuart Mill

Language:
English
Status:
Complete work
Authorship:
Written by the author
Condition of the text:
No scanning noise detected (automatic measure over the whole text, not checked by hand)
Extent:
~55,200 words · 262 passages
Cite this work
  • APAJohn Stuart Mill. (n.d.). On Liberty. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/en/works/john-stuart-mill/on-liberty
  • MLAJohn Stuart Mill. On Liberty. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/en/works/john-stuart-mill/on-liberty.
  • ChicagoJohn Stuart Mill. On Liberty. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/en/works/john-stuart-mill/on-liberty.

Reference to the edition that SigPhi reproduces: SigPhi is its digital reproduction, not its publisher. The edition's year is not in the metadata (hence "n.d."), and the translator appears only when recorded.

What it is about

The classic defence of individual liberty: the only legitimate reason to exercise power over anyone against their will is to prevent harm to others — never their own good, nor the opinion of the majority.

Context and history

Published in 1859, the same year as 'On the Origin of Species'. Mill conceived it with his wife, Harriet Taylor, who had died the year before; the dedication calls it half hers, and he refused ever to revise a line of it. What troubled him was not so much the tyrant as a newer threat: the tyranny of the majority and of custom in democratic societies, the social suffocation of anyone who thinks differently. It is the work that has set the terms of the free-speech debate to this day.

Editorial context, not a citable source: unlike the passages of the work itself, these statements cannot be checked against the corpus.

How it begins
deductions are more difficult. There is no question that Mill's infatuation was the cause of considerable trouble to his acquaintances and friends. His father openly taxed him with being in love with another man's wife. Roebuck, Mrs. Grote, Mrs. Austin, Miss Harriet Martineau were amongst those who suffered because they made some allusion to a forbidden subject. Mrs. Taylor lived with her daughter in a lodging in the country; but in 1851 her husband died, and then Mill made her his wife. Opinions were widely divergent as to her merits; but every one agreed that up to the time of her death, in 1858, Mill was wholly lost to his friends. George Mill, one of Mill's younger brothers, gave it as his opinion that she was a clever and remarkable woman, but "nothing like what John took her to be." Carlyle, in his reminiscences, described her with ambiguous epithets. She was "vivid," "iridescent," "pale and passionate and sad-looking, a living-romance heroine of the royalist volition and questionable destiny." It is not possible to make much of a judgment like this, but we get on more certain ground when we discover that Mrs. Carlyle said on one occasion that "she is thought to be dangerous," and that Carlyle added that she was worse than dangerous, she was patronising. The occasion when Mill and his wife were brought into close contact with the Carlyles is well known. The manuscript of the first volume of the _French Revolution_ had been lent to Mill, and was accidentally burnt by Mrs. Mill's servant. Mill and his wife drove up to Carlyle's door, the wife speechless, the husband so full of conversation that he detained Carlyle with desperate attempts at loquacity for two hours. But Dr. Garnett tells us, in his _Life of Carlyle_, that Mill made a substantial reparation for the calamity for which he was responsible by inducing the aggrieved author to accept half of the L200 which he offered. Mrs.…

Read the full work →

Themes in this work

← Back to John Stuart Mill