Socialism
- Language:
- English
- Status:
- Complete work
- Authorship:
- Written by the author
- Condition of the text:
- No scanning noise detected (automatic measure over the whole text, not checked by hand)
- Extent:
- ~27,800 words · 132 passages
Cite this work
- APAJohn Stuart Mill. (n.d.). Socialism. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/en/works/john-stuart-mill/socialism
- MLAJohn Stuart Mill. Socialism. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/en/works/john-stuart-mill/socialism.
- ChicagoJohn Stuart Mill. Socialism. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/en/works/john-stuart-mill/socialism.
Reference to the edition that SigPhi reproduces: SigPhi is its digital reproduction, not its publisher. The edition's year is not in the metadata (hence "n.d."), and the translator appears only when recorded.
What it is about
Posthumous chapters on socialism: what is just in the socialist critique and what would not work.
Context and history
The Mill both his camps prefer to forget. He accepts much of the socialist diagnosis of property and labour while objecting on grounds of liberty and incentives. Unfinished: he died writing it.
Editorial context, not a citable source: unlike the passages of the work itself, these statements cannot be checked against the corpus.
But it was also said that slavery, that despotism, that all the privileges of oligarchy were necessary. All the successive steps that have been made by the poorer classes, partly won from the better feelings of the powerful, partly extorted from their fears, and partly bought with money, or attained in exchange for support given to one section of the powerful in its quarrels with another, had the strongest prejudices opposed to them beforehand; but their acquisition was a sign of power gained by the subordinate classes, a means to those classes of acquiring more; it consequently drew to those classes a certain share of the respect accorded to power, and produced a corresponding modification in the creed of society respecting them; whatever advantages they succeeded in acquiring came to be considered their due, while, of those which they had not yet attained, they continued to be deemed unworthy. The classes, therefore, which the system of society makes subordinate, have little reason to put faith in any of the maxims which the same system of society may have established as principles. Considering that the opinions of mankind have been found so wonderfully flexible, have always tended to consecrate existing facts, and to declare what did not yet exist, either pernicious or impracticable, what assurance have those classes that the distinction of rich and poor is grounded on a more imperative necessity than those other ancient and long-established facts, which, having been abolished, are now condemned even by those who formerly profited by them? This cannot be taken on the word of an interested party.…
Ask about this workWhat is Socialism about?Summarize Socialism brieflyWhat are the key ideas in Socialism?
← Back to John Stuart Mill