SigPhiSigPhi

Speech In Favor of Capital Punishment

John Stuart Mill

Language:
English
Status:
Complete work
Authorship:
Written by the author
Condition of the text:
No scanning noise detected (automatic measure over the whole text, not checked by hand)
Extent:
~3,790 words · 18 passages
Cite this work
  • APAJohn Stuart Mill. (n.d.). Speech In Favor of Capital Punishment. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/en/works/john-stuart-mill/speech-in-favor-of-capital-punishment
  • MLAJohn Stuart Mill. Speech In Favor of Capital Punishment. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/en/works/john-stuart-mill/speech-in-favor-of-capital-punishment.
  • ChicagoJohn Stuart Mill. Speech In Favor of Capital Punishment. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/en/works/john-stuart-mill/speech-in-favor-of-capital-punishment.

Reference to the edition that SigPhi reproduces: SigPhi is its digital reproduction, not its publisher. The edition's year is not in the metadata (hence "n.d."), and the translator appears only when recorded.

What it is about

The 1868 speech in Parliament for retaining capital punishment for murder.

Context and history

Eighteen fragments, and the Mill text that most surprises anyone who knows him from On Liberty. The argument is that life imprisonment is **more cruel** than a quick death, and that abolition would degrade the value society places on life. It reads better knowing he lost the vote.

Editorial context, not a citable source: unlike the passages of the work itself, these statements cannot be checked against the corpus.

How it begins
duty unless they find somebody guilty; and in their really laudable desire to hunt guilt from its hiding places, expose themselves to a serious danger of condemning the innocent. If our own procedure and Courts of Justice afforded ground for similar apprehension, I should be the first to join in withdrawing the power of inflicting irreparable punishment from such tribunals. But we all know that the defects of our procedure are the very opposite. Our rules of evidence are even too favorable to the prisoner; and juries and Judges carry out the maxim, "It is better that ten guilty should escape than that one innocent person should suffer," not only to the letter, but beyond the letter. Judges are most anxious to point out, and juries to allow for, the barest possibility of the prisoner's innocence. No human judgment is infallible; such sad cases as my hon. Friend cited will sometimes occur; but in so grave a case as that of murder, the accused, in our system, has always the benefit of the merest shadow of a doubt. And this suggests another consideration very germane to the question. The very fact that death punishment is more shocking than any other to the imagination, necessarily renders the Courts of Justice more scrupulous in requiring the fullest evidence of guilt. Even that which is the greatest objection to capital punishment, the impossibility of correcting an error once committed, must make, and does make, juries and Judges more careful in forming their opinion, and more jealous in their scrutiny of the evidence. If the substitution of penal servitude for death in cases of murder should cause any declaration in this conscientious scrupulosity, there would be a great evil to set against the real, but I hope rare, advantage of being able to make reparation to a condemned person who was afterwards discovered to be innocent.…

Read the full work →

← Back to John Stuart Mill