SigPhiSigPhi

Hind Swaraj (Indian Home Rule)

Mahatma Gandhi

Language:
English
Status:
Complete work
Authorship:
Written by the author
Condition of the text:
No scanning noise detected (automatic measure over the whole text, not checked by hand)
Extent:
~34,300 words · 163 passages
Cite this work
  • APAMahatma Gandhi. (n.d.). Hind Swaraj (Indian Home Rule). Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/en/works/mahatma-gandhi/hind-swaraj-indian-home-rule
  • MLAMahatma Gandhi. Hind Swaraj (Indian Home Rule). Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/en/works/mahatma-gandhi/hind-swaraj-indian-home-rule.
  • ChicagoMahatma Gandhi. Hind Swaraj (Indian Home Rule). Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/en/works/mahatma-gandhi/hind-swaraj-indian-home-rule.

Reference to the edition that SigPhi reproduces: SigPhi is its digital reproduction, not its publisher. The edition's year is not in the metadata (hence "n.d."), and the translator appears only when recorded.

What it is about

Hind Swaraj (1909): written in ten days aboard a ship.

Context and history

Gandhi rejects not only British rule but industrial civilisation entire: railways, lawyers and doctors all come off badly. It is where he formulates non-violent resistance as a method and not a tactic. He translated it from Gujarati into English himself.

Editorial context, not a citable source: unlike the passages of the work itself, these statements cannot be checked against the corpus.

How it begins
Thus Professor Soddy remarks that, having just returned from a visit to India, he saw little outwardly to suggest that the doctrine inculcated in the book had attained any considerable measute of success. That is quite true. Equally true is Mr. G. D. H. Cole’s remark that though Gandhiji ii 44 as near as a man can be to Swaraj in a purely person^) sense,” 14 he has never solved, to his own satisfaction, the other problem — that of finding terms of collaboration that could span the gulf between man and man, between acting alone and helping others to act in accordance with their lights, which involves acting with them and as one of them — being at once one’s self and someone else, someone one’s self can and must regard and criticize and attempt to value.” Also as John Middleton Murry says, “ the efficacy of nonviolence is quickly exhausted when used as a mere technique of political pressure”, — when the question arises, ‘ Is non-violence fante de mieux , really non-violence at all ? ’

Read the full work →

← Back to Mahatma Gandhi