A vindication of the rights of men, in a letter to the Right Honourable Edmund B
- Language:
- English
- Status:
- Complete work
- Authorship:
- Written by the author
- Condition of the text:
- No scanning noise detected (automatic measure over the whole text, not checked by hand)
- Extent:
- ~26,300 words · 125 passages
Cite this work
- APAMary Wollstonecraft. (n.d.). A vindication of the rights of men, in a letter to the Right Honourable Edmund B. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/en/works/mary-wollstonecraft/a-vindication-of-the-rights-of-men-in-a-letter-to-the-right-honourable-edmund-b
- MLAMary Wollstonecraft. A vindication of the rights of men, in a letter to the Right Honourable Edmund B. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/en/works/mary-wollstonecraft/a-vindication-of-the-rights-of-men-in-a-letter-to-the-right-honourable-edmund-b.
- ChicagoMary Wollstonecraft. A vindication of the rights of men, in a letter to the Right Honourable Edmund B. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/en/works/mary-wollstonecraft/a-vindication-of-the-rights-of-men-in-a-letter-to-the-right-honourable-edmund-b.
Reference to the edition that SigPhi reproduces: SigPhi is its digital reproduction, not its publisher. The edition's year is not in the metadata (hence "n.d."), and the translator appears only when recorded.
What it is about
A Vindication of the Rights of Men (1790): the first printed answer to Burke on the French Revolution.
Context and history
It appeared within weeks of Burke's Reflections and before Paine's reply. Wollstonecraft attacks the defence of tradition and inheritance, and along the way Burke's sentimentalism, which she reads as a way of passing privilege off as beauty. Two years later she would turn the same argument on the position of women.
Editorial context, not a citable source: unlike the passages of the work itself, these statements cannot be checked against the corpus.
a superstitious age saw the clergy triumphant: the people, for whom chiefly government was instituted, and who chiefly deserve consideration, were the weakest of the whole.’ And just before that most auspicious æra, the fourteenth century, during the reign of Richard II. whose total incapacity to manage the reins of power, and keep in subjection his haughty Barons, rendered him a mere cypher; the House of Commons, to whom he was obliged frequently to apply, not only for subsidies but assistance to quell the insurrections that the contempt in which he was held naturally produced, gradually rose into power; for whenever they granted supplies to the King, they demanded in return, though it bore the name of petition, a confirmation, or the renewal of former charters, which had been infringed, and even utterly disregarded by the King and his seditious Barons, who principally held their independence of the crown by force of arms, and the encouragement which they gave to robbers and villains, who infested the country, and lived by rapine and violence. To what dreadful extremities were the poorer sort reduced, their property, the fruit of their industry, being entirely at the disposal of their lords, who were so many petty tyrants! In return for the supplies and assistance which the king received from the commons, they demanded privileges, which Edward, in his distress for money to prosecute the numerous wars in which he was engaged during the greater part of his reign, was constrained to grant them; so that by degrees they rose to power, and became a check on both king and nobles.…