SigPhiSigPhi

Statesman

Plato

Language:
English
Status:
Complete work
Authorship:
Written by the author
Condition of the text:
No scanning noise detected (automatic measure over the whole text, not checked by hand)
Extent:
~41,100 words · 195 passages
Cite this work
  • APAPlato. (n.d.). Statesman. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/en/works/plato/statesman
  • MLAPlato. Statesman. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/en/works/plato/statesman.
  • ChicagoPlato. Statesman. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/en/works/plato/statesman.

Reference to the edition that SigPhi reproduces: SigPhi is its digital reproduction, not its publisher. The edition's year is not in the metadata (hence "n.d."), and the translator appears only when recorded.

What it is about

Who should rule, and what does ruling well consist of knowing? The dialogue hunts for the statesman's proper art and ends with the ruler as a weaver who must blend opposing temperaments.

Context and history

Here Plato concedes what the Republic would not: that failing the ruler who knows, written law is the best available thing, rigid though it is. The hinge between the Republic and the Laws, and the most realistic turn in his political thought.

Editorial context, not a citable source: unlike the passages of the work itself, these statements cannot be checked against the corpus.

How it begins
his accustomed course, having authority over all other creatures, and following the instructions of his God and Father, at first more precisely, afterwards with less exactness. The reason of the falling off was the disengagement of a former chaos; 'a muddy vesture of decay' was a part of his original nature, out of which he was brought by his Creator, under whose immediate guidance, while he remained in that former cycle, the evil was minimized and the good increased to the utmost. And in the beginning of the new cycle all was well enough, but as time went on, discord entered in; at length the good was minimized and the evil everywhere diffused, and there was a danger of universal ruin. Then the Creator, seeing the world in great straits, and fearing that chaos and infinity would come again, in his tender care again placed himself at the helm and restored order, and made the world immortal and imperishable. Once more the cycle of life and generation was reversed; the infants grew into young men, and the young men became greyheaded; no longer did the animals spring out of the earth; as the whole world was now lord of its own progress, so the parts were to be self-created and self-nourished. At first the case of men was very helpless and pitiable; for they were alone among the wild beasts, and had to carry on the struggle for existence without arts or knowledge, and had no food, and did not know how to get any. That was the time when Prometheus brought them fire, Hephaestus and Athene taught them arts, and other gods gave them seeds and plants. Out of these human life was framed; for mankind were left to themselves, and ordered their own ways, living, like the universe, in one cycle after one manner, and in another cycle after another manner. Enough of the myth, which may show us two errors of which we were guilty in our account of the king.…

Read the full work →

← Back to Plato