Rosa Luxemburg Riot and Revolution (1906)
- Language:
- English
- Status:
- Complete work
- Authorship:
- Written by the author
- Condition of the text:
- Clean text
- Extent:
- ~2,950 words · 14 passages
Cite this work
- APARosa Luxemburg. (n.d.). Rosa Luxemburg Riot and Revolution (1906). SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/en/works/rosa-luxemburg/rosa-luxemburg-riot-and-revolution-1906
- MLARosa Luxemburg. "Rosa Luxemburg Riot and Revolution (1906)." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/en/works/rosa-luxemburg/rosa-luxemburg-riot-and-revolution-1906.
- ChicagoRosa Luxemburg. Rosa Luxemburg Riot and Revolution (1906). SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/en/works/rosa-luxemburg/rosa-luxemburg-riot-and-revolution-1906.
What it is about
Riot and Revolution (1906): the difference between a spontaneous outburst and a revolutionary process.
Context and history
It complements The Mass Strike: Luxemburg did not idealise spontaneity, she wanted to understand it. English translation from the Marxists Internet Archive. The original is German — or Polish, depending on the piece; for citation, the original. This is an article or a congress speech, not a book: its size in the catalogue is the size of the actual piece.
Editorial context, not a citable source: unlike the passages of the work itself, these statements cannot be checked against the corpus.
Copyleft: Luxemburg Internet Archive (marxists.org) 2003. Permission is granted to copy and/or distribute this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License . On the twelfth of last month Rosa Luxemburg was tried at the Criminal Court at Weimar for “inciting to the use of physical force” by the speech she contributed to the discussion on the General Strike at the annual Congress of the German Socialist Party held in 1905 at Jena. The court was densely crowded. Besides a great number of Socialists the audience included a good many “ladies of the highest Bourgeoisie”, the President of the Supreme Court, and, last but not least, a representative of the Ministry. Public Prosecutor’s Charge The incriminating speech having been read the Public Prosecutor submitted his case as follows: “After Bebel had spoken at the Party Congress in favour of the General Strike, other speakers, who took part in the discussion, expressed disapproval of such means, as the General Strike could lead to a physical force revolution, at which the workers may be defeated. Then followed the accused, who derided and sneered at these objections, more especially as they were living in the year of the ‘glorious Russian revolution’. She said: ‘we should be fools if that would be no lesson to us’, and she emphasised the fact that in Germany we had also arrived at that point where Evolution must give way to Revolution. Respecting her comrade, Heine, she stated he was not in touch with the masses who, as history proves, had always shed their blood for the exploiting class; and she thought they may once shed their blood for t
What is Rosa Luxemburg Riot and Revolution (1906) about?Summarize Rosa Luxemburg Riot and Revolution (1906) brieflyWhat are the key ideas in Rosa Luxemburg Riot and Revolution (1906)?
← Back to Rosa Luxemburg