SigPhiSigPhi

The Persian Mystics: Jalalu'd-din Rumi

Rumi

Language:
English
Status:
Selection or partial work
Authorship:
Written by the author
Condition of the text:
No scanning noise detected (automatic measure over the whole text, not checked by hand)
Extent:
~19,400 words · 92 passages
Cite this work
  • APARumi. (n.d.). The Persian Mystics: Jalalu'd-din Rumi. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/en/works/rumi/the-persian-mystics-jalalu-d-din-rumi
  • MLARumi. The Persian Mystics: Jalalu'd-din Rumi. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/en/works/rumi/the-persian-mystics-jalalu-d-din-rumi.
  • ChicagoRumi. The Persian Mystics: Jalalu'd-din Rumi. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/en/works/rumi/the-persian-mystics-jalalu-d-din-rumi.

Reference to the edition that SigPhi reproduces: SigPhi is its digital reproduction, not its publisher. The edition's year is not in the metadata (hence "n.d."), and the translator appears only when recorded.

What it is about

Rumi, in the 'Persian Mystics' series.

Context and history

A selection from the Masnavi and the ghazals of Jalal ad-Din Rumi (1207–1273), the poet of Sufism and founder of the whirling dervishes. Poetry here is the form of the thought, not its ornament: the reed torn from the reed bed, with which the Masnavi opens, is at once an image and a thesis about the soul.

Editorial context, not a citable source: unlike the passages of the work itself, these statements cannot be checked against the corpus.

How it begins
Súfí poetry has greatly influenced Western thought. Many of the German mystics wrote as the Súfí poets had written before them. Particularly might be mentioned Eckhart, Tauler and Suso. Concerning the last mentioned I may quote the following passage to demonstrate my meaning: "Earthly friends must needs endure to be distinct and separate from those whom they love; but Thou, O fathomless sweetness of all true love, meltest into the heart of Thy beloved, and pourest Thyself fully into the essence of his soul, that nothing of Thee remains outside, but Thou art joined and united most lovingly with Thy beloved." There was rapturous language both with the Persian and German mystics. The great difference between them was that the German mystics, for the most part, were ascetics, the Persians were not. Then again in the nineteenth century Hegel was loud in his praise of Jalálu'd-Dín Rúmí, calling him a great thinker as well as a great poet, but somehow he seems to put Jalál's Pantheism first, his Mysticism second. Surely this was putting the cart before the horse? To trace the scope of the influence of Súfí thought in England would be extremely interesting, but the limits of this little book will not admit of our doing so. The influence was at first among the few; but optimistic lovers of the East believe that Oriental thought is daily becoming of more interest to Western minds. The student knows that Edward FitzGerald's rendering of Omar Khayyám, was anything but a faithful translation; that FitzGerald shook up Omar's words like so many dice and set them to the music of wine, roses, and pessimism. The Omar Khayyám Club read FitzGerald, but not Omar Khayyám, and in consequence they have fallen into the error of associating Omar with Bacchus. But, nevertheless, we must be grateful to FitzGerald. He has given us a great poem, and stirred, let us hope, many of his countless readers to a more faithful study of Persian poetry. The indefatigable Dr.…

Read the full work →

← Back to Rumi