SigPhiSigPhi

De Cive

Thomas Hobbes

Language:
English
Status:
Complete work
Authorship:
Written by the author
Condition of the text:
No scanning noise detected (automatic measure over the whole text, not checked by hand)
Extent:
~2,530 words · 12 passages
Cite this work
  • APAThomas Hobbes. (n.d.). De Cive. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/en/works/thomas-hobbes/de-cive
  • MLAThomas Hobbes. De Cive. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/en/works/thomas-hobbes/de-cive.
  • ChicagoThomas Hobbes. De Cive. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/en/works/thomas-hobbes/de-cive.

Reference to the edition that SigPhi reproduces: SigPhi is its digital reproduction, not its publisher. The edition's year is not in the metadata (hence "n.d."), and the translator appears only when recorded.

What it is about

De Cive (1642): Hobbes's political theory, ten years before Leviathan.

Context and history

Written in Latin in Paris exile while England slid into civil war. The state of nature, the war of all against all and the covenant that ends it are already here. This is the English translation; the Latin is not in the catalogue.

Editorial context, not a citable source: unlike the passages of the work itself, these statements cannot be checked against the corpus.

How it begins
duty, I know not what could have been added by humane Industry to the completion of that happinesse, which is consistent with humane life. For were the nature of humane Actions as distinctly knowne, as the nature of Quantity in Geometricall Figures, the strength of Avarice and Ambition, which is sustained by the erroneous opinions of the Vulgar, as touching the nature of Right and Wrong, would presently faint and languish; And Mankinde should enjoy such an Immortall peace, that (unlesse it were for habitation, on supposition that the Earth should grow too narrow for her Inhabitants) there would hardly be left any pretence for war. But now on the contrary, that neither the Sword nor the pen should be allowed any Cessation; That the knowledge of the Law of Nature should lose its growth, not advancing a whit beyond its antient stature; that there should still be such siding with the severall factions of philosophers, that the very same Action should bee decryed by some, and as much elevated by others; that the very same man should at severall times embrace his severall opinions, and esteem his own Actions farre otherwise in himselfe then he does in others; These I say are so many signes, so many manifest Arguments, that what hath hitherto been written by Morall philosophers, hath not made any progress in the knowledge of the Truth; but yet have took with the world, not so much by giving any light to the understanding, as entertainment to the Affections, whilest by the successefull Rhetorications of their speech they have confirmed them in their rashly received opinions. So that this part of philosophy hath suffered the same destiny with the publick Wayes, which lye open to all passengers to traverse up and down or the same lot with high wayes and open streets; Some for divertisement, and some for businesse; so that what with the Impertinencies of some, and the Altercations of others, those wayes have never a seeds time, and therefore yield never a harvest.…

Read the full work →

← Back to Thomas Hobbes