Voltaire's Philosophical Dictionary
⚠️ Content warning
- Language:
- English
- Status:
- Complete work
- Authorship:
- Written by the author
- Condition of the text:
- No scanning noise detected (automatic measure over the whole text, not checked by hand)
- Extent:
- ~87,400 words · 415 passages
Cite this work
- APAVoltaire. (n.d.). Voltaire's Philosophical Dictionary. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/en/works/voltaire/voltaire-s-philosophical-dictionary
- MLAVoltaire. Voltaire's Philosophical Dictionary. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/en/works/voltaire/voltaire-s-philosophical-dictionary.
- ChicagoVoltaire. Voltaire's Philosophical Dictionary. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/en/works/voltaire/voltaire-s-philosophical-dictionary.
Reference to the edition that SigPhi reproduces: SigPhi is its digital reproduction, not its publisher. The edition's year is not in the metadata (hence "n.d."), and the translator appears only when recorded.
What it is about
The Philosophical Dictionary in a single volume: Voltaire's war on superstition, article by article and in alphabetical order.
Context and history
The form is the argument: a dictionary is consulted rather than read through, which made it impossible to refute as a whole and easy to circulate underground. It appeared anonymously in 1764 and was burned in Geneva and in Paris. A note on the edition: the catalogue holds TWO editions of the Philosophical Dictionary — this single volume and another in ten. They are not a duplicate: they are different selections and translations, and the articles do not correspond one to one. The original is French.
Editorial context, not a citable source: unlike the passages of the work itself, these statements cannot be checked against the corpus.
ransacked everything; there will still remain a few bakers, a few cobblers, a few tailors, a few carpenters: the necessary arts will survive; only luxury will be annihilated. It is what was seen at the fall of the Roman Empire; the art of writing even became very rare; almost all those which contributed to the comfort of life were reborn only long after. We invent new ones every day. From all this one can at bottom conclude nothing against the antiquity of the globe. For, supposing even that an influx of barbarians had made us lose entirely all the arts even to the arts of writing and making bread; supposing, further, that for ten years past we had no bread, pens, ink and paper; the land which has been able to subsist for ten years without eating bread and without writing its thoughts, would be able to pass a century, and a hundred thousand centuries without these aids. It is quite clear that man and the other animals can exist very well without bakers, without novelists, and without theologians, witness the whole of America, witness three quarters of our continent. The newness of the arts among us does not therefore prove the newness of the globe, as was claimed by Epicurus, one of our predecessors in reverie, who supposed that by chance the eternal atoms in declining, had one day formed our earth. Pomponace said: "_Se il mondo non è eterno, per tutti santi è molto vecchio._" _ASTROLOGY_