The Principles of Psychology, Volume 1 (of 2)
- Language:
- English
- Status:
- Complete work
- Authorship:
- Written by the author
- Condition of the text:
- No scanning noise detected (automatic measure over the whole text, not checked by hand)
- Extent:
- ~290,000 words · 1,401 passages
Cite this work
- APAWilliam James. (n.d.). The Principles of Psychology, Volume 1 (of 2). Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/en/works/william-james/the-principles-of-psychology-volume-1-of-2
- MLAWilliam James. The Principles of Psychology, Volume 1 (of 2). Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/en/works/william-james/the-principles-of-psychology-volume-1-of-2.
- ChicagoWilliam James. The Principles of Psychology, Volume 1 (of 2). Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/en/works/william-james/the-principles-of-psychology-volume-1-of-2.
Reference to the edition that SigPhi reproduces: SigPhi is its digital reproduction, not its publisher. The edition's year is not in the metadata (hence "n.d."), and the translator appears only when recorded.
What it is about
The first volume: habit, the stream of thought, the consciousness of self, memory and attention.
Context and history
Here is the chapter that gave the 'stream of consciousness' its name: James argues that mental life is not made of separate ideas hooked together but of a continuous flow in which nothing ever returns the same twice. The phrase left psychology and ended up in the twentieth-century novel. Published in 1890, after twelve years of work.
Editorial context, not a citable source: unlike the passages of the work itself, these statements cannot be checked against the corpus.
in the frog's spinal cord until he has shown that the useful result which the nervous machinery brings forth under a given irritation _remains the same when the machinery is altered_. If, to take the stock instance, the right knee of a headless frog be irritated with acid, the right foot will wipe it off. When, however, this foot is amputated, the animal will often raise the _left_ foot to the spot and wipe the offending material away. Pflüger and Lewes reason from such facts in the following way: If the first reaction were the result of mere machinery, they say; if that irritated portion of the skin discharged the right leg as a trigger discharges its own barrel of a shot-gun; then amputating the right foot would indeed frustrate the wiping, but would not make the _left_ leg move. It would simply result in the right stump moving through the empty air (which is in fact the phenomenon sometimes observed). The right trigger makes no effort to discharge the left barrel if the right one be unloaded; nor does an electrical machine ever get restless because it can only emit sparks, and not hem pillow-cases like a sewing-machine. If, on the contrary, the right leg originally moved for the _purpose_ of wiping the acid, then nothing is more natural than that, when the easiest means of effecting that purpose prove fruitless, other means should be tried. Every failure must keep the animal in a state of disappointment which will lead to all sorts of new trials and devices; and tranquillity will not ensue till one of these, by a happy stroke, achieves the wished-for end. In a similar way Goltz ascribes intelligence to the frog's optic lobes and cerebellum. We alluded above to the manner in which a sound frog imprisoned in water will discover an outlet to the atmosphere. Goltz found that frogs deprived of their cerebral hemispheres would often exhibit a like ingenuity.…